Ah, if a third-party site publishes “second-hand” facts where it’s not possible to trace their exact origin, then it’s OK.
Auf gut deutsch; verarschen kann ich mich selbst
It is still only a selective selection of facts that only benefits those for whom it is intended to benefit.
and it is common knowledge and an open secret
And in my opinion, game masters and other staff members should take player dissatisfaction seriously and forward the problems, not dismiss them as unimportant, ridiculous, etc. Even if official data is lacking, it’s a fact that the current state is a major disadvantage for 50% of players and is unbalanced.
There are already some problems getting the Aim 120c to Mach 4, but an R-77-1 can reach Mach 5 without any problems under the same launch conditions.
However, I find some of Gaijin’s logic rather questionable, for example with the DIRCM of the Mi-28NM. It is physically impossible for this DIRCM block to cover 360°, but Gaijin says that this is not the case. So I wonder, what is their source for claiming that this laser can see through all materials? This shows that Russian weapon technology is better than it actually is. Or the R-27ER/ET, which has a maximum speed of Mach 5.8 ingame, but in all the documents you can find, Mach 4.5 is listed as the maximum speed.
Regardless, this will not change, as others and I have already given up hope :/
Not quite correct but almost, the third part website can contain secondary sources, but not secondary information. If the third party only contains the information then the source is also third party. If the third party contains the secondary source then you have access to the secondary source.
So for example if a third party blog made by a random guy that writes facts about a missile then that cannot be used. But if that same exact blog and random guy posts a secondary source document so that you can open and read that secondary source then that is okay.
This is website a great example of this: ( https://tanks.mod16.org/ )
It’s a third party site made by a random guy, what he writes on the website we cannot use. BUT he uploads all the historical documents he writes about so that we are able to download those documents and use as primary or secondary sources for reports.
So for the S-tank (Strv 103) information the blog looks like this: ( s-tank – Swedish tank archives )
That page alone cannot be used, but towards the bottom he links to the source document:
That document when opened looks like this:
THAT document can then be used as a primary source for reporting (because it’s directly from the Swedish defence forces material administration).
So even if it’s the exact same information in the document and in the blog, only the document will be able to be used for reporting and not the blog.
I hope i have explained it well enough to be understood now.
I think it’s easier to write to Trump and ask him to confirm that the AIM120C pulls 60g and is twice as fast as the R77-1 than to claim that Gajin balances the game. But it probably won’t be an official source either.
Gaijin does have on the tighter end of scrutiny for documents. But their classification for documents being primary/secondary is fairly normal. If anything I’d saying gaijin actually more or less has the same standards as other places where accurate sourcing is required (say research articles or wikipedia), just gaijin actually strictly sticks to it, whereas stuff sneaks through in other places.
wikipedia is so bad, I go on any of english version of russian stuff and they all almost get things wrong with improper sources. Funnily enough, the actual russian language version of the same articles usually get things right, makes me wonder why the english articles arent just translations of the russian ones
Keep in mind this cyclogram is for ejector launches.
For rail launches it would guide immediately (or after like 0.1-2 seconds, forgot exactly) (but gl finding sources for that)
The English Bias Maneuver, deals with that based of Pre-launch information about the target, that’s why the fins are deflected off the rail in the videos
would that also apply to ejector launches?
R-77 has something similar in that it guides immediately when off the rail, but that only applies to rail launches.
When its ejector launched there’s a slight delay because it has to clear aircraft first. I assume the reason why amraam has such high delay is because its modeled with an ejector launch in game instead of rail launched
True. Lemme imagine a random tick of time for the guidance of the missile.
AIM-120D with 1 sec delay cause it can be put into the weapon bays of the F-22 and F-35. It sounds dumb because it is dumb
