I. Want. Choclate.
1 Like
Yeah i like it with chocolate chips and chocolate syrup. But plain chocolate ice cream still great
It never intercepted Khinzhal/Iskander/Kh-22.
Then the 1998 ASRAAM will be fine then :P
Hoenstly. The simplest solution is just to not model IIR. Make it 2x IIRCM, largely looks like what they’ve done with the SAMs
Doesn’t sound very equivalent
Blame the US for being cheapskates and not making a better missile. But Aim-9X is closer to ASRAAM and other Gen 5s than it is to the Aim-9M, Magic II and R-73.
Yes they have shot down some Iskanders (not always) and multiple Khinzals
No.
They have. Multiple times. They are only hypersonic in transit, to actually hit anything, they have to slow down at which point, they are no harder to intercept than any other cruise missile
1 Like
You have no common sense do you?
9X range (9M motor): 💀 much shorter than ASRAAM
The IRIS-T is fully compatible with all current US aircraft. Even if the Aim-9X meant that other missiles would need to be implemented, there is literally nothing stopping the US from getting them.
i guarantee you usa won’t get IRIS-T
The XM800T got DM63 (which was very negative because it pushed it way higher in BR than it should have been).
Gaijin slaps munitions on things all the time. If they don’t add IRIS-T to all modern sidewinder-carrying aircraft, it just shows how biased they are.
Yeah. That is kinda the point of ASRAAM. It has longer range than any other WVR missile and is stupidly fast. Only thing with greater range is MICA IR and thats a BVR missile with an IR seeker.
ASRAAM was litereally designed to shoot first, kill first.
But giving the US AIm-9X and leaving everyone else with Aim-9M would be just stupidly unfair
Let’s not forget USMC F-35B and possible AUS F18A in the US which did have BOL and ASRAAM
ASRAAM and IRIS-T were specifically designed to use the same mounting as Aim-9 for better inter-compatibility. But that doesnt mean the US will get IRIS-T in game