AIM-120C are way better than AIM-120A/B

I think AIM-120C are way superior to AIM-120A.

The C variant burns longer, which means fighting targets out to 30km+ will be more effective. I’ve had a few kills out in long range that would likely not be given for the A/B variant.

The enemies just does not have as much time to notch because of the speed.

And the C variant may actually be better for constantly maneuvering targets because the missile has to move too, draining speed that would require fuel to push it up to speed again.

People say, but AIM-120A is better for close range; I don’t think there’s too much differences. They’re 35G missiles, and in close range (10-15km) they likely don’t have enough time to dodge/notch anyway.

That said, Aim-120, even A variant are some of the best in the game. I’ve never got a kill outside 10km with the R-77 (now that’s a truly bad missile)

3 Likes

they are not better

there is pretty much no point in shooting past ~20km because it is too easy to defeat the missile, so there is no reason to bring 120C over 120A/B

again they are not, they are some of the worst top tier ARH missiles

10 Likes

Aim-120A/B are better sub 10km because they accelerate faster (less mass, same motor) which makes them better at close quarters. Past 10km… There isn’t really much difference.

C5s are better at long range because of the longer burning motor.

The issue. Any AMRAAM fired at ranges where the C5s longer burn time would come into account are so easy to defend against, that it’s very very rare to actually get a kill. Usually the target has to not even try to defend for the missile to hit.

This means that a majority of AMRAAM kills occur at closer ranges, where the C5 advrange is heavily mitigated and the A/B be just as successful. The only area where C5s might also outperform A/Bs is rear aspect shots, but only just

2 Likes

Well it’s just like Fakour 90 in this case; on itself it’s not that good of a missile, but it will kill alt tab players faster than others…
.
Perhaps these were the kills I was getting; if that was the case, I still gladly trade better CQC performance for better long range.

What is good to you?

1 Like

MICA, R77-1, AAM4, and PL-12 are far better than 120

even Darter, Derby and R-77 are better for the closer range meta currently going on

6 Likes

Fair enough. I find derby quite Ok at 15km though, whereas I’ve never got a kill with the R-77 outside 10km; it has this airbrake that even other “bad” missiles lack.

I much prefer the Aim-120 because I find it more reliable at slightly longer ranges. I’ve had numerous times in chase/partial chase situations where PL-12s have not had enough speed/range to catch the plane. They also seem to lose speed a lot quicker too.

I have the JF-17 with export verson of the missile. Quite ok too, but it’s not an amraam.

They do well against targets under 20km imo

This is kinda the point.

A vast majority of fights occur well within 20km. I rarely get kills past 10-15km.

AMRAAMs only meaningful advantage over everything else is range. Unfortunately, after everyone learned how to defend without 100m MP… It became the least important attribute. Maybe if AMRAAM had a better seeker (Several reports in for that) it would be better, but its just too easy to defeat

And the only meaningful advantage the C5 has over A/B is also more range.

2 Likes

or they could just give it a realistic fin AOA, currently it is too low and prevents the missile from pulling enough to hit shots that AIM-120 has hit in testing

1 Like

Yeah that too. Though the kinematic buffs wont necessarily change how easy it is to defeat at medium+ ranges. Only seeker buffs would do that.

But would help a lot at closer ranges

Though I will be honest. Im intrigued about how the Contrail changes will impact AMRAAM slingers. They can be far more sneaky up high. I know I quite often target the highest contrails first, figuring they’ll have the hardest time getting into the notch

1 Like

I’d take the PL-12 all day. The range is above average and they are on par with derby at short range HOBS where the aim-120 is just useless.

I’ve used them all, and in my opinion, PL-12 is third best missile overall after the R-77-1 in second place and the mica in first of course.

3 Likes

It won’t make any difference for me since at range I don’t even look for the contrails, only to my RWR with adjusted sensitivity to avoid false positives.

Yeah, though a smart player, flanking high, with Radar off until much closer… Could be quite deadly

Yeah, but contrails would make no difference there because you would not be looking up then, and if you do, at short range its too late to do anything.

Never happened to me but I do it a lot to others endgame. Turning the radar on and off just to know the position for a second or if IRST is an option use that instead within 20km or so.

I had people trying to do that to me but failed because I’m a cautious bastard late game.

Don’t IRST only work for rear aspect?

You might be able to get into that high position unnoticed. I know when Im sat at 30k ft, im visually scanning for contrails

No. But are capped to 30km? (I think? I know they have an artificial max, but I cant quite remember what it is off the top of my head) and obviously the aircraft is hotter from rear-aspect and so the further you can lock

No, you can pick up at long ranges if they are afterburning even in frontal aspect. In rear or side aspect you can sometimes pick up stuff at like 30km if skies are clear and the target is hot enough.