AIM-120 C5 is a smokeless/reduced smoke engine

Compared to 120A and 120B variants, the C5 modification introduced a smokeless/low smoke motor, and should be added for historical purposes, like how the 9M is smokeless/low smoke.

3 Likes

Dawg AI is the absolute worst possible source

14 Likes

Devs are aware

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Bdn69n0zp3Ib

1 Like

Sooo… what was the point of this post?….

3 Likes

even A had it.

I forgot to check the community issues 🤦‍♂️

1 Like

Fair enough lol

1 Like

no its not
AI collected the data and represent it in a summary way only
if AI saids so
then it should be most likely true

Bruh go to a AI page and itll say AI can make mistakes always check your source material back it up never present based off of what AI said get an aswner then back it up yourself and remember you need to have credible material. Wikipedia is not Credible so dont bother posting from wikipedia.

3 Likes

There is no such real sources unless you are asking thr producer to give you one. Wiki or AI do a good summary and yes they do have mistakes but that wont deviate a lot, beside gaijin isnt really a realistic game company anyway.

every month or so there’s someone posting AI generated sources. even if we all know AIM-120C-5 is smokeless, AI is not a proper source.

Except Gaijin doesn’t take Wikis or AI anyways. They give summaries, sure, but both abstract tons of sometimes necessary information. In the case of AI, it tries to fill in gaps of knowledge with fabrication.

And that’s why its not a source, and never will be. Using AI as a source is like using your parrot as a reference. Sure, it will regurgitate some facts, but its not a fountain/source of information. It may just say “Fuck” because you might say it a lot.

1 Like

You’re in luck. Issue has already been marked as accepted on the issues page.

same for AIM-54C

2 years in the making and it’s been ignored. Community Bug Reporting System
Good luck.

Id love to see you try to pull something from Wiki and present it to someone and they ask whats your source. Wikipedia is not a credible source and never will be almost anyone can go on there and change something. AI makes mistakes yes its summarized but im telling you what it doesnt know it will fill in gaps also id love to see the links it summarizes from. Go find a credible source and yes in some cases you must go to the manufacturer but that isnt a bad or hard thing either.

As stated earlier the information has been passed to devs from a bug report. The topic of this thread was immediately lost with the AI conversation and does not need to continue.