I don’t know details about the order but maybe specification requirements forced to make such design choices. It looks similar ye but i don’t think it was planned
“no vt4 bc we no like Japan, but well will take the best helicopter in the game tho”
1 Like
The game isnt ready for a 20km F&F Tiger
China operates the AH-64E, same as America.
@SoloWingErika_25
We’re not LARPing as the Indonesian servicemen, we’re playing the vehicle.
Prove that HMD and 6x ARHs are in official unrestricted Mitsubishi documentation for service aircraft, otherwise it’s a false equivalency.
Boeing already stated AH-64E is compatible with JAGMs.
I can find no supporting evidence regarding the AH64E to these nations. Regardless, assuming this is the case:
Keep American rubbish out of the French tree. We do not need boring copy paste from yanks, and the home grown option would be a better addition both regarding efficacy, and relevance to the tree.
Gaijin doesn’t care if the operating nation uses the armaments or not anymore. As long as the platform in this case the A64E platform uses it that’s more than fine.
They did it with the F18s in game.
they dont as long as the operating nation isnt US
in which case you need proof that the armament was used operationally on that specific variant of the vehicle and even then they might not add it see LJDAM on the f15e and f16c and other examples
Like I said before, Gaijins hypocrisy is catching up real fast and its killing their game. They’ll keep pretending that they care about feedback that isn’t backlash.
2 Likes
Yes but it shouldnt get AGM-179 JAGMS because the only operators of those missiles were the US, UK, Poland, and France
2 Likes
That’s not how vehicles work.
Vehicles don’t stop becoming compatible with confirmed weapons just because a military doesn’t buy them.
Trade less missile with more range sound fair to me i mean game already had 16 km missile 4more KM not going to change much.
it does if the vehicle was sold before the weapon was even a thing lol.
AGM-65Bs are usable on F-4E without modification.
AGM-65E-2s are usable on AV-8B without modification.
they arent? the aircraft needs rewiring to display the tv seeker on the radar.
It already has that from AGM-65A integration.
You can even use AGM-65Ds with AGM-65A avionics. You can’t see the thermal signatures, but you can use it.
True, especially considering Gaijin uptiered Spike carriers to the same br as other nations helicopters with better missiles (like JAGM, LMUR).
AH-129D could also receive ER2, even though at first I thought it’d be better to keep this missile for the future AW249.
It seems the MAST-F missile only weighs about 35 kilograms. If it is implemented in the game in the future, it’s foreseeable that it would essentially be a Spike with a longer range. If its range reaches 20 km, its maximum speed likely wouldn’t be much higher than the Spike’s, and could even be worse .
The Taiwanese Apache in the Chinese TT does make sense (even if it’s not needed), but I’m really not a fan of the Indonesian and Dutch Apaches going into the Japanese and French trees, respectively. I get that these nations need true top-tier helicopters but I think throwing AH-64Es into any tech tree is just lame, especially if they belong to a sub-nation and not even the main nation.
how is it op? also the AH-64E helicopter in the Chinese tech tree does not have DIRCM. The AH-64E is not good without the DIRCM
2 Likes
A Chinese AH-64E literally does not affect anything. Everyone would take the Z-10 over it anyways since the AH-64E in Chinese tech tree lacks DIRCM. It’s just a nice thing to have there.
4 Likes