AGS to recieve M900

I think that the AGS is due to receive the M900 shell, especially at its new BR. I made this post a little over a year ago, asking for M900 to be added to the AGS, as it felt relatively ineffective sitting at 11.3, especially facing the hordes of T-80Us.

But now, with the AGS being 12.0, I don’t think there’s any reason for it not to be added. AGS facing the vehicles that are at 12.0 and 12.7 (max uptier) is combat ineffective unless it’s shooting an Ariete or Type 10 (even then it will not pen the turret, that’s how bad sub 400mm pen is.)

And for the nerd that’s going to come here and say “but but M68 can’t fire M900 I found this little document that says so” please shut up link from previous post.

I understand the AGS is basically a gun on tracks and can be difficult at times to take out when you only have said gun to shoot at, but the AGS has been uptiered so much that this no longer matters anymore as it can’t pen anything it sees.

4 Likes

Another good source for M900 compatibility is this one.
Outlines all the advantages and disadvantages of each candidate vehicle and updated requirements for the competition. Compatibility with the next generation KE round is specifically mentioned

If it gets added it will be moved to 12.7 lol does the US not use DM63? Even with that one it will be moved to 12.3 because of the crewless turret.

Why add DM63? Not only does the US not use it, it’s weaker than M900.

Because I don’t want it to get moved up any further, I prefers it to be 12.0. Outside of cqc city maps this thing can be easily abuse via hull down and you will easily maintain 3-4 KD in it