Stopped reading right there.
So at the end? It’s supplementary hence why I listed it last. There isn’t a lot of sources for the AGS program. If you read the study from DTIC you can see most of information from the Jane’s page is actually correct.
Keyword being most and why Jane’s isn’t a valid source for anything.
It has same value as some scrabble written on a piece of toilet paper.
And yet Gaijin have defaulted to using it in the absence of other sources in the past.
1 Like
Gaijin added things without any source, so Jane’s is as good as that. Holds as much value as an empty piece of paper.
Older Jane’s documents tend to hold some value.
1 Like