If they made it so the cruise altitude was almost hugging trees or buildings then i could see it being very good
they wont
I mean the kh38 is able to be launched with just gnss so i see no reason why this couldnt?
1 Like
F-15E, EX and F-16Cs.
And before anyone says anything, show me R-77 double racks on Su-27SM, Su-30s, KH-38s on the Su-30MKM or an actual KH-38MT on anything
7 Likes
[DEV] Finnish F/A-18C MLU 2 is missing the AGM-84H SLAM ER // Gaijin.net // Issues only made this since they gave it to the RAAF hornet.
Speaking of which, why do not have havenap in the game yet? It’s long overdue.
Hope they add this to the F-111s
I highly doubt it would be game breaking, especially since Russia can now intercept a full loadout from basically any plane in game with ease, unless you’re carrying 50x250 bombs that you just carpet bomb their spawn
B-2 with 80x JDAMS when?
its a needed upgrade, not very good
sure but kh38 is not a cruise missile, it has Standoff in the name, how th do you add a standoff weapon without standoff capability. agm130 is in the game and has the same issue
GBU 39 spam says what. best way to take out spaa apart from the fact they can just shoot them down easily enough lol.
Is it the laser guided variant that can be launched via gnss alone then?
As it currently stands, the weapon is almost useless in the test battles I’ve done. You first NEED a line of sight on the target, and while the terrain follow is cool and useful in certain situations, will cause the missile to lose LOS on the target making it go dumb and not revert to GNSS or last known POS. Really almost every launch I’ve done in test battles, the missiles lose its target and goes dumb, doesn’t matter if the map is flat or hilly, open or forested/urban.
First it was AMRAAMS, Now it it time for American A2G weapons, They are really making almost every new thing for US DOA lol. I bet, next would be SEP V3 with lower armor than SEP V2
2 Likes
AMRAAMs aren’t, haven’t, and won’t be DOA (though as good in particular fields as they maybe should be, debatable), but I think with how they have ordinance coded atm. They need to just make the missile GNSS atm until they code how the missile really works into the game.
i know this will sound odd but as soon as the thing loses LOS it should rely on GNSS and it does, its just the GNSS is apparently not where the stationary target was.
I’m not sure if this is a bug with only this missile or all IR plus GNSS missiles but its dumb. especially when the thing will make itself lose LOS by following the terrain.