not the version we have in the dev server.
the one in the dev server is the AGM-84H/K, an anti-tank variant of the anti-ship AGM-84. iirc it has (irl) IR + GNSS + DL(?)
correct me with this one, it’s been a long time since i searched for SLAM-ER’s info.
not strictly anti-tank, land attack in general vs. anti-ship
for now it seems like pantsir food
it follows the terrain and all, but it’s still a subsonic missile and still keeps pretty high altitude despite the terrain following feature (it stays like couple hundred meters above the ground)
this and the AGM-154A1 JSOW that got added in the current implementation isnt really meta defining or making CAS any easier. For the time being AGM-154A1 JSOW is just a cooler looking JDAM-ER and AGM-84H SLAM-ER is just fun to use.
Don’t take me wrong, I’m glad they added new stuff (that should’ve been added long ago but anyway), but it doesn’t really change anything. What I’m really waiting for are the GBU-53/B Stormbreakers that US should get in the same update the SPICE 250 got added to decent amount of jets. It’s literally the same in performance, except for US having slightly worse airframes than let’s say EF2000 or JAS39E.
iirc, IRL it cruises at lower altitudes and can be designated to a set GPS course (imo course designation will not come soon), but i think that it can be set to a GPS target and then switch to IR guidance with pilot assistance. I these features will come to WT in the near future, but reducing the cruise altitude and refining the terrain avoidance will be extremely beneficial to the SLAM-ER.
At this point, everything’s Pantsir food.
All of the non-russian AGM / GBU / JDAM etc. munitions are going to be underpowered compared to the new Pantsir that is being added next major update.
The meta now is not deadly munition, it’s the amount of munitions. Adding all of those modern munitions aren’t useful if they can’t be used with their true potential and stats.
We need better munitions to destroy this “Overwhelm the SAM” meta :/
Mitl… many missiles have it, too op for now
Agreed. However the AGM-84’s cruise altitude could be lowered to reduce interception chances by SAM.
If it stays the same as of now, then it will only stay as a gimmick, and no one will really use it seriously (In my opinion).
If its lowered it will just crash into a gigantic mutant trees 70m tall
Is it faster than AGM-65?
Edit: Nvm scrolled up and found my answer
I’m looking at u, american hypersonic missile capable of reaching Mach 10
Yeah honestly they just need to lower the cruise altitude and then i think it would be pretty good
Although if you lower it too much you will run into the issue of not having LOS hence why it has a datalink IRL that currently is not modelled
iirc the datalink is manually observated and corrected by the second pilot of the twin-seat Hornets? I remember they have the capability of “looking through the missile” like a FPV drone and guide it even when the plane is notching (90°).
Yes, it’d also require a Datalink pod (Like Kh-59ME’s APK-9 or AJ.168’s likely mounted on the other side of the plane) to be fitted.
Trees are just barely over 30 m ingame?
That’s what they want you to believe… We must’nt forget what happened…
Huh?
I dont play ground much but most of the pine type modeled trees in game are 40-50 meters but that could just only be the ones on air rb maps.
This makes me wonder, Is there any FNF US A2G weapon that is not subsonic?
AGM-130 exists
(It’s at least supersonic for a while after launch)
AGM-65G if it’s modeled right is supersonic for a bit after launch :)
