It would be the equivalent. If they did the right thing it wouldn’t have R73 or R27ER. Since “Aim-9X” is too powerful but R27ER with mach Jesus and 60g pulls isn’t.
Did the R-27ER shoot you down if you were flying close to the ground? Can I take more than 2 R-27ERs?
You can take 6.
Mig-29? I’m telling you about the first time the MiG-29 and F-16 aircraft appeared.
Yeah lmao, the ER was added at the bequest of the American mains whining about how ‘OP’ the R-73 would be if added to a mig-29 upon release, as a result we got the best fox-1 and a lot more whining from their behalf
2 Likes
Based
I’ve been waiting for the R-73 for the MiG-29 for the second year now.
1 Like
And I am telling you, that you get 6 - 10 of them at the same BR as the F16A and F15A. Give the F15C its 12x AMRAAMs it can carry. Or for “balance” reduce the 27s to just 8. That would be balance.
Pretty much anyone with any shred of credibility will get the same results.
I have gone as far as to test it against one of the few guys that was capable of winning against the DARPA AI dogfight program a few years back. The results were basically the same…F-16 wins against MiG-29 in any style of fight and it’s easy to do.
1 Like
on a flanker… not a Mig, besides the ‘12x amraam loadout’ is a myth and was a one-off mounting test on the F-15C, it is more applicable to come on the F-15EX but that’s still a way off
Can you show where the F-15C carries 12 AMRAAM missiles, prove that the Su-27 cannot carry 10 missiles
2 Likes
He can’t within reason, because his sole purpose in this thread is to fulfil the role of a typical whiny US main and provide meme material :p
2 Likes
He probably doesn’t understand that if the developers had given the R-73 instead of the R-27ER, they would have suffered even more from the MIG-29.
Yes, and already been done countless times on an F15C. Being able to mount them, is far more than the standards set by soviet aircraft in game.
Are you only interested in what is deployed to the fleet when it comes to NATO but are ok with soviets getting fictional loadouts? Should the F15C be held back from something we have photo evidence of, while the Yak-141 never tested with even a single loadout?
Which standard are we going with? The its ok for fictional loadouts but not ok for real world abilities with photo proof? Or we can admit the soviets in game are handlheld and given fairy tail armaments to ensure russia never looks bad even in a video game.
Let’s not forget about the Mi-28A, T-80U in Sweden, T-90C in Great Britain. Don’t forget about the only HSTV-L prototype ever built. Don’t Forget Japan’s Non-Existent F-16. But at the same time, Russian bias
3 Likes
Let’s not forget about Xp-50 and Xp-55…two of the most busted premiums in the game.
Or P-38K and P-59.
Or F2G-1.
Or how the F4U-4B is like a lazy implementation of an F4U-5.
Or the F5C w/flares that it never carried. And a flight model that isn’t even based on the manual.
Hell, half of the premium side of the ground tree for USA is T-series tanks.
4 Likes
I don’t understand why there is no Germany bias, US Bias, Sweden bias, but only Russian
Because this is the English speaking forum so you get a bunch of “FOX News Americans” who think that the game should just give them kills as soon as they push a button.
The same kind of people that would inject bleach into themselves to treat COVID.
7 Likes
I remember Tucker Carlson :(
He always told the truth.
No one is being punished for anything though. Gaijin has always stated they will always introduce vehicles/equipments by capability rather than years.
As Smin has said, the development teams that handle tanks, ships, and planes are different and have different criterias. We need to stop comparing planes to tanks.
3 Likes