Unless they’ve spectacularly fucked the materials science, J20 has characteristics that would put it at the very minimum on the lower end of low observability aircraft. If it doesn’t actually meet the criteria for stealth, that is.
I don’t “get” you “on” anything - just correcting an obvious typo 'cos not everyone will know it.
i do not either but you are talking about them without knowing basic concepts on how they work
We will only know once information is publicly released by the PLAAF. (not through leaks)
I was subtly referring to that one Chinese APFSDS leak :P
what the hell is PLAAF? sounds stupid.
This forum’s hard to tell who’s being a tool and who’s aware of the old lore.
I’ve a headache already from this git, so sorry for taking shots at you.
1 Like
…
People’s Liberation Army Air Force
- Brings up J-20 not being stealthy refuses to elaborate with any coherent information
1 Like
I’m American how could I work for China? also I thought it was Planetary Liberation attack Association of Freedom.
You got what I meant, you’re not baiting anyone.
I am more or less certain the stealth is overstated (not nonexistent, but overstated). But from the design standpoint, it does have a lot of the features needed to be a stealth aircraft.
Also, just to be completely clear on my biases, I loathe the J20.
bait on what? PLAAF no I seriously did not know until I got back an read what you replyed
Design wise yes that’s why I said it could be improved to make it better.
hmmmm i wonder whyyy, didnt certain F-35 documents go missing that one time? probably nothinnnn
1 Like
You couldn’t design your way out of an open field, hush.
I meant that nobody here knows classified info on the J-20’s stealth. Eyeballing it will not prove or disprove its stealth well, as there are other factors.
Oh they definitely filched it.
1 Like
Don’t tempt me Fluffy.
yanks J-20 documents subtly