Kugelblitz does fine at 7.0.
This is an Armored Car not a Light Tank.
I know it’s armored vehicles. In the game, armored vehicles are classified into light tanks.
2 Likes
I don’t want to see the ZSL92 against WW2 era vehicles!
1 Like
Then just say Light Tank Category.
As SPAA the elevation angle, fire rate and the traverse speed are all too low, and currently it has this stupid artifical 25 sec reload. It is literally worse than the 5.0 ZSD63/PG87.
1 Like
Dude, just bring the APDS back and make it the Chinese version BTR80 at 7.3 line up with PLZ-83-130.
And if you feel unbalanced with this 500 rd fire rate, just toggle it a bit with a 200 rds version.
Cuz why not?
6.7 with no scout and no apds dealing with WWII doomsday heavys, this thing can do absolutely nothing.
And why bother use it when we have PG87 that has the same dual 25mm guns at 5.0?
Is this “excellent mobility” does it any good as an wheeled SPAA?
Why not make fully use of its mobility and set this as a scout LT as it is designed to be.
2 Likes
yup, cuz Kugelbllitz stands 12.7 and this chunk can’t even survive 5.56.
IDK, R3 T20 at 6.0 and this thing far worse at every perspective at 6.7 as a SPAA just sucks…
2 Likes
yes, SPAA was very bad before entering 8.0. they had no advantage in the confrontation with the fighter jets
and the vast majority of them are also unable to deal with ground vehicles.
In an awkward situation
The APDS of ZSL-92 breaking through 60 ° 22mm steel plate at a distance of 1500M at a firing rate of 200 is very painful
1 Like
if it really can do that in 1500KM, that will be really hurt🤪
1 Like
ture, but isn’t this whole thread is about giving the APDS of ZSL92 back,
to make it a scout LT like BTR-80
In such way, it don’t have to be bad…
China mains salty.
Any one ever seen a btr80 used as an spaa? If not how could this apc set as a spaa?
so do russia main
3 Likes
Im not the BTR-80 is not even that good due to lack of stabilization. But maybe it just does not suit my play style.
I think it has better gun elevation and its at a lower BR.
The issue of ZSL-92’s APDS seems to have been deleted
1 Like
because that’s undisclosed information
we only need to prove that 92 has APDS. Search from publicly available information.
then let gaijin refer/copy to bradley data
1 Like