China mains salty.
Any one ever seen a btr80 used as an spaa? If not how could this apc set as a spaa?
so do russia main
2 Likes
Im not the BTR-80 is not even that good due to lack of stabilization. But maybe it just does not suit my play style.
I think it has better gun elevation and its at a lower BR.
The issue of ZSL-92’s APDS seems to have been deleted
1 Like
because that’s undisclosed information
we only need to prove that 92 has APDS. Search from publicly available information.
then let gaijin refer/copy to bradley data
1 Like
Why would they delete it after acknowledging it? It seems like Gaijin wants to push the ZSL92 through in its current state.
2 Likes
I disagree only with the radar part, but yeah, this is definitely NOT an SPAA. Gaijin’s choice here is questionable.
1 Like
The elevation angle of -8 ° to 52 ° is absolutely unqualified for machine gun SPAA
2 Likes
Gaijin please~~~
1 Like
I agree with you.zsl92 does the similar work to btr80.you know,the meaning of
Chinese “zsl” is same as Russian"btr"
4 Likes
Agree, 100%. It makes no sense for this to be labeled as SPAA, by all means keep it in the SPAA line if Gaijin wants to but give it APDS/APFSDS, Scouting, and change it to a Light Tank. Also, make the Wiesel 1A4 a Light Tank as well whilst we’re at it
2 Likes
I agree as well. Personally I don’t believe that any weapon deserves to have its ammunition types removed as a form of balance.
And I clarify weapon because I think that, provided there are two or more examples of said weapon in the same tree, it is OKAY to remove specialized anti-tank shells from one vehicle whilst keeping them on another.
For the ZSL-92, there are multiple better options that could replace it in the AA role, and thus we could give this vehicle its APDS provided it gets a suitable replacement to fill the resulting gap. Alternatively, we could get a different ZSL-92 with an ATGM and APDS at a higher BR.
And as for the Wiesel, I will say, when it was first announced I initially agreed that the Luchs A2 should have been destined for the light tank line. Now, I realize that doing so alongside the Wiesel 1A4 wouldn’t solve the issue of it being exponentially worse, which is why I think it should remain in the SPAA line except without DM63 to justify its addition.
1 Like