@Hartsy1
Screenshots are now false information? Facts are false information?
Prove that everyone in this topic is wrong, I’ll wait.
You’re using a roland and a cv90 as an example and multiple people have shown you it’s not the case with the ADATS… Meanwhile you continue to ignore that evidence and just argue with false information.
1 Like
Hey guy’s look look… The ADATS can look up in gunner sights… Posts a photo of the roland and cv90… Lmafo.
elevation angle remains the same it is locked to the guns elevation. Only change is your are looking lower now.
6 Likes
Omfg… You have to be an AI bot to be this detached from reality.
1 Like
Contrary to your previous statement.
1 Like
Gaslighting at its finest
That quote is irrelevant to the post you responded to.
The post you responded to is addressing the fact the camera through gunner sight is different while still acknowledging that it needs fixed because that’s my stance.
@Hartsy1 No one is gaslighting you.
ADATS’ gunner sight [not the gun barrel sight] needs fixed no matter how many times your posts insult others.
I will continue to not insult you.
Adding nothing to the conversation as i stated you would earlier, you’re continuing to argue and flip your original statements to seem like we was wrong. Classic
@Hartsy1
I changed nothing.
My original statement: “Camera through gunner sight is what you need to use to run these tests.”
And: “It’s not 90 degrees currently which is incorrect.”
At no point did I sway from those two statements.
Also who’s we? It’s just your posts claiming people here are wrong.
All your posts have done is insult us for wanting ADATS to be accurate.
You actually ain’t worth a reply. Honestly the best thing is to have you removed from this post, you’ve done nothing but argue semantics, adding no value to the conversation.
1 Like
They were edited to reflect accurate information.
3 Likes
Obviously, he’s known for it. Try’s to pass you off like you’re the one who’s wrong. Hence why i said gaslighting.
2 Likes
Exactly. All that changed was me adding evidence that the camera through gunner sight is incorrect currently, despite being marginally different.
Yet I get attacked for that.
I think it’s best we all move this topic along and get a bug report put together to have the sight fixed.
No point in pointless squabbles.
2 Likes
You right.
If gunner sight and primary gun limits are the same, and the marginal difference noted in the screenshots is parallax, a dev will say that.
And if not, then hopefully fast results.
1 Like
I have to get ready for work if someone in here yourself, Devil, Hartsy. Whoever want’s to put an bug report together and post the link in here I will up vote it hopefully if enough of us does it will get attention.
Got on the forums today hoping for DevBlog but as expected will have to wait till thursday.
Which was what i was originally trying to do prior hence why i brought it up in the first place… That was till someone joined in gaslighting an argument, editing their posts to seem correct and try and act like the civil individual in an attempt to derail the conversation, I’ve just blocked them now because it’s an utter waste of time speaking to them as they do this on every post. Enjoy your day at work away from all this lol.
So Hartsy blocked people here just cause we’re trying to fix ADATS… okay.