@Hartsy1
I provided screenshots of Roland having that same exact thing.
The only issue is the camera through gunner sight isn’t correct while being different.
You don’t get to complain about an unrealistic feature you’re using to gain advantage in MBTs just cause it makes it inconvenient in IFVs and SPAA with both guns and SACLOS missiles.
CV90:
Friend’s ADATS @DevilO6 :
“Clearly no change.”
Obviously a marginal change, despite the camera through gunner sight still being incorrect.
Wtf are you on about? I didn’t choose anything? This is gaijins design. You have no idea what you are talking about.
What are you adding to this conversation other than false information? You’re wrong on multiple accounts and continue to argue. It’s the same with every post with you. You seem to want to derail every subject rather than admit you was wrong.
@Hartsy1
Screenshots are now false information? Facts are false information?
Are you going to double down on that ridiculous claim…
Talking about ADATS in an ADATS discussion is derailing an ADATS discussion?
Dude, proof-read your posts.
Prove that everyone in this topic is wrong, I’ll wait.
You’re using a roland and a cv90 as an example and multiple people have shown you it’s not the case with the ADATS… Meanwhile you continue to ignore that evidence and just argue with false information.
@Hartsy1
The ADATS is not a Roland or CV90.
I’ve updated this post with the ADATS screenshots from the post I’ve posted already as well as linked to previously:
Keep ignoring the evidence of ADATS and claiming everyone is wrong.
I’ve posted those ADATS screenshots 3 times now.
Hey guy’s look look… The ADATS can look up in gunner sights… Posts a photo of the roland and cv90… Lmafo.
elevation angle remains the same it is locked to the guns elevation. Only change is your are looking lower now.
Omfg… You have to be an AI bot to be this detached from reality.
But yeah, as I was saying gunner sight view is different, and any issues related to that should be historically reported on its own.
With complaints like this, you have to use camera through gunner sight.
It should have a 90 degree view, and it currently doesn’t.
The gun itself correctly has a 59 degree view.
But you know, stating basic facts is somehow wrong.
Contrary to your previous statement.
Gaslighting at its finest
That quote is irrelevant to the post you responded to.
The post you responded to is addressing the fact the camera through gunner sight is different while still acknowledging that it needs fixed because that’s my stance.
@Hartsy1 No one is gaslighting you.
ADATS’ gunner sight [not the gun barrel sight] needs fixed no matter how many times your posts insult others.
I will continue to not insult you.
Adding nothing to the conversation as i stated you would earlier, you’re continuing to argue and flip your original statements to seem like we was wrong. Classic
@Hartsy1
I changed nothing.
My original statement: “Camera through gunner sight is what you need to use to run these tests.”
And: “It’s not 90 degrees currently which is incorrect.”
At no point did I sway from those two statements.
Also who’s we? It’s just your posts claiming people here are wrong.
All your posts have done is insult us for wanting ADATS to be accurate.
You actually ain’t worth a reply. Honestly the best thing is to have you removed from this post, you’ve done nothing but argue semantics, adding no value to the conversation.
They were edited to reflect accurate information.
