I dont think anything with a missing smokeless motor has gotten one yet…
Gaijin seems to be tremendously unhappy about the development of smokeless motors in some nations and not a particular other one…
I dont think anything with a missing smokeless motor has gotten one yet…
Gaijin seems to be tremendously unhappy about the development of smokeless motors in some nations and not a particular other one…
I guess ill do a VT-1 low smoke, but i cant promise anything.
DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH PERFORMANCE ROCKET MOTOR FOR THE VT-I TACTICAL MISSILE by R. W. Magness and J. w. Gasaway:
The reduced smoke propellant was required to limit plume interference with optical and RF signals to the missile. Use of a reduced smoke propellant, with the lower inherent performance compared to metallized propellants, made design optimization essential.
Oh, i was not expecting that.
Thanks, will add it.
Here’s the full paper if you are interested in.
OO
Thanks, will give it a read later.
It should be find to be used, right?
Cinfirmed it is, so added to the report.
Btw, not sure about on other maps, but atleast on Afghanistan EC, the new AF’s seem to be being used as cosmetic location in the center of thr map with no actual game impact, while the actual AF runways are still the old style. No new AA defenses eithet :/
Great job to you and @DevilO6 finding this stuff and making the bug report! Its greatly appreciated! o7