guys this is so unfair the abrams sucksksks we need f2-2 rpaotr and am-9x III and ambrams x to compete with bvm and fankor.
8 Likes
Can’t wait for the US main rage when he gets his handheld raptor shitter shattered through his own incompetence.
“Bro wtf how 2 dodge undodgeable r-79 misslor wtf so unfair raptor best jet how come my kd 1:10 in it”
Anyways another thread made by a US main shitter getting assblasted that he sucks at a kids game
7 Likes
so i just linked you to the U.S Government congressional hearing where members of the military were testifying under oath, and your response is go back to 4chan?? Go back to leveling up and you might make it into tier 6 ground kiddo.
yeah off topic and he brought it up, but hey if people want to keep their heads up their ass about that topic i’d say let them already talked to people before they died that worked in the C.I.A , and air force about this and have my own friends who were in the Navy all say they’ve seen this stuff first hand.
nice nuke
@HondaCivici
See thats the problem, thats all these people have ever done and they are mainly RU mains, hell even @SPANISH_AVENGER have noticed most of these people don’t even have any vehicle near top tier but they want to jump on the bandwagon simply because they hate the U.S, even gaijin has people on their team that have been caught trying to keep people bug reports closed down ( heres looking at you trxxster ) and they sit and wait YEARS before they fix something. It took them 5 YEARS to finally give the HSTLV its proxy rounds and the ability to lock onto aircraft, and it took them what 3 year to give the begleipanzer its stabilizer.
then you have these people asking stupid questions or making completely insane statements " the abrams has no spall liner! " meanwhile anyone with a brain that knows what Line-X is at Du-pont are sitting here laughing at these people. The Entire Abrams line of vehicles have spall liners, the bradley have spall liners, the m113s have spall liners, the M60A3 has spall liners, the stryker has spall liners, even the HSTLV has spall liners.
Oh let them keep that bingo card, i need something to laugh at.
Another thing, you see how more of these people are making mocking posts?
This is all they do day after day.
and im going to make another point at how badly gaijin treats nations at this game and how certain nations are easier to play
Now let look at the gaijin favorite tanks/meta tanks
Oh its another person who has high win rates in russian tnks but low win rates in american tanks… I WONDER WHAT COULD BE THE CAUSE OF THAT?
1 Like
I mean, to sum it up, Abrams is high ceiling, can do very well in, with the reload in combination with good mobility and depression, however survivability will mean if you are not so good, using the wrong tactics (or in a bad map) or just on a bad day it will not work at all. Russian tanks, less skill required, less likely to be killed whilst the reload and mobility does mean you can’t do as well as Abrams in some advantageous situations, but overall, people care more about when they are doing badly. And Clickbait… Plus US CAS comes out way too much, I literally see 0 USA ground players after 5 minutes.
1 Like
How did he acknowledge some of these, I am not saying these reports are false, but his attitudes towards other reports are very different, such as encyclopedias and tertiary websites are all considered by TrickZZter as non valid, although I do see the valid points, he has applied a seemingly different standard to these reports.
same does as Russian main think they need T-14 to complete with Strv 122
long ago they need R-73 to complete with AIM-9L lol
T-90M when 2A6 came out too hey
they are mocking about US but they aren’t any better (or worse)
now the recent one R-77-1 to complete with AIM-120A (when there are AIM-120C-7 when R-77-1 put to service lol)
4 Likes
How about we stop adding bonkers new tech all together.
1 Like
I mean Leopard 2A7 is the best tank in game (and STRV122s all of them) by quite a margin, so I can’t really say they are complaining about nothing, although their points are not that valid. Also regarding the T90M vs Leopard 2A6, the suggestion was there but so was that of Leopard 2A7 which was an equal if not superior counter part anyways.
i mean i wanted a game mode of cold war jets vs cold war jets… and a certain manager said no :(
1 Like
I really hate to see stupid Spitfire in 8.0 RN, they are absolutely useless.
1 Like
It will face the F-14 the way the game is heading. 🤦♂️
They can just “Aim weak spot” that right the same quote the RU main love to say to western players when they complain about their armor now, they had to do the same to 122 and 2A7V and suddenly those tanks become overpowered.
3 Likes
Thankfully the stupid IRIAF is getting moved up, 12.3 with missiles that can hit at 30km with good chance, wtf.
Yup notice how russia always gets something game breaking first before everyone else? 2S6 ? planes with ground radar, even though other nations have planes with ground radar. Special functions to their planes (su-39) that block missiles IRCM, but gaijin wont take time to model ECM pods on other planes or helis.
2 Likes
Not exactly, the ‘weakspots’ are not the same as Russian ones, like I have lots of experience with ZTZ-99A so I will use that since rounds are basically the same, the rounds when shooting LFP will often be ‘eaten’ and no pen, despite the stupid protection analysis saying otherwise, and even that is not 1 shot kill so I have to wait 7.1 seconds to kill him. Meanwhile Russian tanks is basically you shoot LFP, which is smaller, but 1 shot almost guaranteed. Side on wise, autoloader will also get you killed a lot more, unless stupid ERA eats it as it does. I am not saying the Leopard 2A7s/Strv122s are superior by far, but just a bit on every side makes it the best tank, and other nations that have worse pen and worse armour suffers even more.
1 Like
I remember there was that was productive when the SEPv2 was still in the dev server
You see, we are still in test phase, first the inside, then dev server then the entire WT player base gets to suffer from the issues not fixed in dev server, as it is the ‘third test’.
Leopard 2 is designed to be more survivable yeah it supposed to be harder to kill it been designed with survivability in mind nothing surprise me in this case
1 Like