The point of M829A3 was to have something that could take out tanks at longer ranges without relying on pure brute force.
I’m not going to list all types of ERA that NATO has, my dude. I already just said Russian and Chinese ERA, idk how it’s hard to understand what I mean.
You do realize pump location is completely wrong on Abrams series right? it should be on engine deck not hull.
Dont put my words into my word, i’ve never said they are ‘‘Gods Work’’ i just said they work when they needed, which is much better than not having it.
You know that i was talking about certain degrees, no need these kind of games.
I’ve never said Leo2A6’s are the second best tanks right after armored Leo2’s, i just claimed its better than M1A2’s in my eyes(Except SEPV1), to me Second best tanks always changes to my current mood, sometimes Leclerc’s are better sometimes Leo2’s and sometimes even M1A2’s.
Those certain angles are the same for both. M1s turret either stops both, or not. The practical difference in the weakspot size in the M1s turret against either can only be differentiated by counting pixels, really.
Dont put my words into my word, i’ve never said they are ‘‘Gods Work’’ i just said they work when they needed, which is much better than not having it.
I’m not, it’s simply an expression which you are reading too much into.
You do realize pump location is completely wrong on Abrams series right? it should be on engine deck not hull.
That’s very cool, you missed the joke there.
I’ve never said Leo2A6’s are the second best tanks right after armored Leo2’s
I never said that you do so explicitly, but, the implication was there, regardless of whether you really meant it or nah (cause, y’know, you very clearly declared that 2A6 is better than the M1A2 series ‘overall’, if that is not an implication then I dunno what else could have been…).
And that makes Leo2a6 second best tank? According to other people best tank list changes a lot, some people prefers reload and mobility over firepower and armor thus they value Type-10’s and Leclerc’s more than Leopards and some do opposite, that doesnt mean Leo2A6 becomes second best tank.
Forgive me if i just simply missed your genius joke right after your hostile behaviour, maybe try more friendly apporach so people can utilize your jokes more?
Anyway it seems your hostility still on and as long as it stays that way this conversation will stay away from bein productive.
Oh I dunno, maybe being declared to be superior to the M1A2s, which aside from up-armored Leo 2s, are the next on the list for being the most meta MBTs because of their combination of firepower, armor, mobility, gun-handling, and survivability?
Subjective preferences aside, of course, because I am not interested in whether some guy somewhere considers a one hit wonder MBT to be “better” because it suits his playstyle more.
Anyway it seems your hostility still on and as long as it stays that way this conversation will stay away from bein productive.
I’ll teach you how to use the tools in game correctly, with glee.
Give me 30 minutes to record and upload a motion picture, because it’s actually going to be representative of reality instead of whatever you see through your blinders.
Give me 30 minutes to record and upload a motion picture, because it’s actually going to be representative of reality instead of whatever you see through your blinders.
Bro is going to record a video of him checking every nook and cranny just so he can find the few pixels where DM53 can perforate M1A2s turret but M829A2 can’t, actually hysterical, anyways;
You are, quite literally, the most adorable little liar I have ever seen on this forum.
Look at that, only takes ~10 degrees of angle off center to lolpen abrams turret at 1km while leopard 2A6 turret is both immune and symmetrical in protection to both sides at even worse angles!