-
Jokes about pixel scumming
-
Proceeds to pixel scum on his own pictures which obviously show penetration on a majority of the cheeks.
1 Like
M829a2 doesnt pen K5 under 1.5km, 1000s of hours of footage of anybody playing the abrams in game could prove you wrong
Shh man, you can’t just call someone out like that for being a hypocrite lmao
1 Like
2 Likes
Love the mouse sarcasm💀💀💀
“abrams can pen leopard turret” 💀💀 Excellent work
1 Like
Oh no, it’s all genuine and not sarcasm.
Very clearly these two tanks have identical turret protection. After all, our beloved ubermensch, defender of the fatherland, harboring no bias whatsoever said his Leopard 2A6 was worse than the M1A2, and he’s never said a lie in his life!
3 Likes
OH NO, HES NEVER LIED BEFORE, A SAINT THIS MAN MEIN FATHER LAND GOOD SIR, REINMETAL SUPREMACY.😂😂😂😂😂
These two tanks are identical, we must be blind. I should contact my eye doctor!
1 Like
What does 2A6s arc protection have to do with M1A2s resistance to DM53 & M829A2 respectively? You didn’t even read what you were actually answering to, yet you’re gloating as if you have just had a “gotcha moment” when all you did was show off your own idiocy?
Actually, I’m sure now that you haven’t read neither my nor Panther’s posts since well, we were talking about certain angles, here, have this;
;)
Very clearly these two tanks have identical turret protection.
If only irony had a voice.
Proceeds to pixel scum on his own pictures which obviously show penetration on a majority of the cheeks.
So now I can’t even show that there are spots on the M1s turret that will stop both M829A2 and DM53 without getting jumped by US mains?
Brah. Y’alls living in an actual echo chamber of your own creation.
3 Likes
3 Likes
The leos ricochets most shots at the turret any way so you’re magical picture doesn’t prove anything. If you’ve fought the leo 2a7s you would know that the turret no matter range with ricochet.
So your post is saying that “US mains” move goalposts.
Whether or not that’s the intent of your post, that’s what it looks like to a random reader.
Funnily, tu quoque.
“The difference between the two can only be counted in pixels”
Gee whiz, wonder who said that, yeah? Y’all wanna remind the gallery?
Identical turret protection, no?
Now check what’s the context behind what you’re quoting (like, I dunno, M1A2s turret versus DM53 & M829A2, but you, in all of your glory, would rather attempt to “shame me” and completely shift the goalpost to something else). All you’re doing is showing you’re obtuse.
Mate, you can’t wriggle your way out of this one. I’ve got the receipts.
M1A2 turret easily penetrated by DM53 at certain angles, Leopard 2A6 not. M829A2 is inferior to DM53 and literally doesn’t need to be shown.
4 Likes
Abrams has really weak armor around the gun compared to leopard 2A6/7. Hitting the mantlet easily kills 1/2 crews.
1 Like
Goddamn, never thought you’d expose yourself like that mate
Well, I guess we’re done here since your little attempt has failed and what you’re doing now is just clutching at straws and you’ve already been given your fill of attention, boring.
4 Likes
@Jεcka @Lolman345 @BeautifulTai_wan
What are three arguing about? I was gone for an hour or two and there was 50 new messages since.
“Those certain angles are the same for both”
What, you want me to show that M829A2 needs ~5 degrees extra angle to lolpen the M1A2? Terribly sorry sire, I ignored your splitting of hairs for the point of the matter that is the fact that the Leopard 2A6 turret is objectively superior in protection to the M1A2. I apologize for calling you a liar, despite also still catching you out lying. Oopsie.
1 Like
Nothing anymore really ;)
edit: Lolman doesn’t know that tu quoque isn’t an ad hominem, funny.