Abrams x tank

Yes they are. CV90120. CV90 Mk.IV are two more examples in addition to the Challenger already mentioned.

Edit:
Strv 122B+
CT-CV 105HP
HSTV-L
RDF/LT
M60 120S
R400
Object 292
etc
etc

There are many Prototypes and Technology Demonstrators in the game already and they are still being added.

2 Likes

Fone with if you want to turn the game into mwt

Plus i was talking about top tier and not actually fillers gap.

“Turn the game into” ?

These are just a small selection of those types of vehicles already in the game and has been in the game for years. And those types of vehicles are still being added.

Then you have to clarify that, it still doesn’t apply though. There are several top tier vehicles of that nature already in the game.

Almost sure that the Leopard 2 PSO was added at the top at its time so it wouldnt be the first time

The ones in game are gap fillers who help the tree to keep up.

But things such as abrams x and kf51 will be the only one used.
People waste time expecting more powerful and more modern while the game is not even fixing its own issue and actually add a reasonable maps to fully use the things we already have.

Tanks battle, more like csgo maps. Completely unrealistic to the real life. Who tank battle at a minimum 1km.

Bvr, we are doing bvr at 6km while irl with the same missile can be done at 10km or 12km altitude.
60km maps with 130km missile is stupid. The 14.3 maps should be for the 13.3.

So they are welcome in the game then, and would serve a purpose if added. (and no, there are still vehicles already in the game that doesn’t follow this limitation)

I now fail to see your point or what you are trying to say here.

No i didnt mean by that. I meant by brand new design tank that are still in prototype phase

already exists in the game.

More modern than we have ? I dont think so

CV90 Mk.IV , CV90120-T , SPYDER AIO , Black Night. Just to name a few of the top of my head.

To add next-generation vehicles, first is needed its predecessors (i.e. CATTB, M1 Thumper, Object 195 (and others countless 152 mm main battle tank test beds), NKPz 87, Leclerc T3 and so on), I don’t think we are ever seeing next-generation, be it early or late main battle tank this year, let alone part of the vehicles that brought these to light as listed earlier.


As far I’m aware there very few to no technology demonstrator in the Soviet Union tech tree, mostly are prototypes because: the terminology “technology demonstrator” wasn’t widely used so technically there are very few to none or it’s exactly none. This same would apply to United States tech tree at early-mid Cold War vehicles if I’m wrong with exceptions like TCM AGS.

which begs the question: Where is the difference? If we know enough about the prototype why not add it?

These are not next gen tanks. They bring nothing to the table

Adding mbt with 800mm apfsds and aesa radar with a 30mm mounted gun and a autoloader.

The game is not even ready to have such things.

We dont even have the latest mbt variant of the game.

These are completely new designs and need to have their own br.

That doesnt really prevent them from being added tho

Yeah but if we start adding such thing.

The game is gonna die or it is already

This is not what you stated from the start though. You’re shifting goalposts.

Yes we do. A couple of tech trees are at their maximum for in service most modern vehicles and some even have the prototypes for the next not yet in service vehicles, the Black Night in the British tree being one such example and the CV90 Mk.IV in the Swedish tree is another. IRL Sweden even JUST bought the CV90 Mk.III (“Mark 3”) so they are not even buying the Mk.IV (Mark 4) version to have in service.

You can compare how many you want it will still not be the same.

The mbt lvl we have are simple.

You want next lvl tank.

The current passed or already in game demo / prototype are not even close and you should know.

Obj292 and anyother in game, the only they bring is either a big gun or a prototype autocanon