It doesn’t because they will get it wrong. Snail sized common sense and amount of care.
Waiting for forums to delete my post for the 5th time in this thread.
Whoever deletes this is a beta
2 Likes
welp, looks like it got denied for the following reason:
My question is where did they get their initial sources?
Unless they have access to classified information, aren’t they also making an assumption?
1 Like
They measured a M1 from a museum with photogrammetry using rulers. There’s no way they got any of the internals correct without either guessing or classified info. I’d argue they guessed since the piece in question is not modeled at all in game. What they should have done in that bug report is confirm they missed a part and figured out the numbers themselves.
I’m sure thats why the turret ring armor is so off too.
8 Likes
Yeah but they can make assumption
You cant
thats basically every rank VI to VIII american tank
m735 round being the same pen as t320(which is steel carbide) and damage
as well as xm578e1 round being worse than t320
irl m735 can pen im pretty sure ~350mm rha(sources i read from some other posts-forgot what it is sadly)
gajin just doesnt want to touch us vehicle unless they are forces to or changes that doesnt benefit anything
1 Like
That statement is not entirely true if you also look at the vehicles outside the top tier that have features that remain broken, first thing came into my mind is the T-62M1, it has an incorrect zoom level for several years, to be precise it was like after 3 years they decided to fix it. One update they also messed up the object 279, which make the bomb resistance stopped working entirely, for many months it will die to bombs of any size which I only notice some improvement after like 6 months of the first report lol
If anything, they neglect most things almost equally, since I don’t know their SOP, let’s just assume that it was laziness lol
1 Like
I don’t doubt that :(
I think they care more about new premium vehicles
There is one ongoing bug almost closing one year and remain unfixed, extremely annoying when you encounter one of those… happens to vehicles with autocannons like SPAAs and something the likes of 2S38, when certain parts of the vehicle get damaged will result in them firing their cannon full auto for several minutes, unlimited ammo or and no overheat, I also heard that is visual error as only other players could see it and hear the noise but not the owner of the vehicle.
I’ve seen that happen a few times, even shows up in replays
they buffed the ADATS recently, but only with the G-pull of the missile from 35 to 42(should’ve been 60 but that’s dual-plane)
the problem is, nato vehicles receive buffs so hard and you need a lot of evidence for it, russian modern vehicles receive buffs because… yeah.
1 Like
I remembered one post that I think was passed on to the developers. Did they make armor from depleted uranium?
that was years ago and even tho it passed it never got implement in
1 Like
So that explains the Type 87 and Gepards firing seemingly forever . . .
Why I dislike people with national biases because there Is a TON of vehicles especially in 9.0+ range that need to be reexamined and fixed but not just for one nation.
1 Like
so Im not the only one who feels that the abrams breech gets destroyed way to easily
Not really a national bias, endgame stuff is just played way more. The Gunshield on the Abrams accounts for 10 different versions which is nuts.
3 Likes
nah wasn’t directed at you or any one person when most vehicles at top tier are wrong
Oh yeah, best we can do is just make threads like these
2 Likes
I read a little here and saw that some people think that the holes in this part were through, but it seems that they are not through or I am very much mistaken. https://topwar.ru/23416-analiz-bronirovaniya-tanka-m1a2-sep-abrams.html
if anything im sure 25 millions for a tank wouldnt miss a small armor part on the gun but well what do i know