Silence indeed. These too
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cHv8RM6tfvNo
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pVl3yYdklDQZ
The devs/mods are clearly coping. Turret ring is still not volumetric after years lmfao. They fixed the Arena’s volumetric armor the day after it was on the live server. Such beta energy from them
this one is a gem, a certified gaijin classic:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9pd3QSYFMjsV
accepted 10 months ago lol
They really did just go dark in this thread….wow
Remember the KH-38MT thread?
Welcome to that, again.
Damn thats crazy
They ask for proof now they get it and they ignore it…
Every single report I’ve ever made has been denied, I would rather keep to the forums
very based name.
Thanks, I think lol (I’m old I don’t know the current slang)
So we’re going on 8 days and still, complete silence.
Oyep, Gayjin moment
Wish I had contact info for Spookston, between this, the bugs I’ve already reported, and my post on the HSTVL/RDFLT missing 100mm of pen, should really be brought to attention.
Poor spooks, didn’t the guy spend money to have them declassified? Seen your reports as well, good work.
Thanks man, awesome name haha
please don’t abbreviate Spookston into a slur.
Yep and he lost the documents to a dying drive so unfortunately they are lost to time
Unless they would be willing to give him new copies
Check out this post
NGL I don’t know why you guys want mods attention on the thread. Bug reports still have to go through their own process regardless of what is said on here, and other moderators don’t really have sway over corrections like this anyways.
99%+ of the bugs reported are denied by whoever takes care of bug reports. Most of the accepted bug reports are immediately shelved and never looked upon again. (Volumetric armor for the lower mantlet was accepted what? Two years ago?) Most of the bug reports I’ve read are denied for either convenience of not having to do fixes or on technicalities such as reports by students from military academies. Once it’s denied, that’s it, you can’t comment any more and it’s essentially a closed topic. The report I made in the past was denied and quoted the following “Reports that are based on assumptions without any reference to numbers are not acceptable.” Instead of using common sense and acknowledging that the component is missing, the bug manager denied the bug report completely. Now that we have an actual photo of the component in question, I do NOT doubt if I made another bug report that the bug manager would resort to something such as “without numeric measurements this is not acceptable”. With the Abrams which makes up of 60% of the top BR vehicles in the US line, this is not something to be simply ignored.
