@Zyranovos Still waiting for that respond of yours.
1 Like
I’m sure you are
The Х-38МТ missile ‘not existing’ is fine with me, remove it, I hate playing against it, that’s fine, my issue here isn’t with CAS however. If you think Russia is being babied you really haven’t played it, have you?
I play Sweden and top tier Japan, I have 0 issue killing these tanks man, in 1 shot almost every time, it really just sounds like a skill issue.
I can pull up the thread where these people whined about it man, I didn’t say you guys were, I just said “don’t”
2 Likes
If you think Russia is being babied you really haven’t played it, have you?
The best vehicle in my Chinese lineup is the T-80UD/DU-1 which is a Ukrainian/Russian vehicle, I don’t know if this is pattern recognition but it might just be me (I’m being sarcastic), the T-80s are infinitely more survivable than all ZTZ variants excluding the stage 1/2 variants (I got all of China researched and unlocked as well).
I’ve got a plethora of clips of me shooting the side of the T-80 or T-90M and getting absolute sh*t on it, call me a crazy guy but why does it take extra precision to knock out Russian tanks but American tanks themselves are weakspot?
The T-80 utilizes the MZ autoloader which holds the charges vertically, it should be a nuke in-game which it simply isn’t
Look at me with a straight face and tell me the T-80 or T-90 doesn’t have more survivability than the Abrams when hit including protection, there is simply no way on earth you can as it’s a fact rather than opinion/preference.
When a Russian vehicle is the best MBT China has it sometimes makes me question the balance of Russia in-game…
it really just sounds like a skill issue
I don’t think you’ll want to bring skill into this conversation, for your sake at least. I average a KDR of around 2.5 to 3 for all my rank 8s.
10 Likes
Where have you said this?
That’s because of the way china designed their tank differently, and they are indeed poorer than dirt in the armor department.
Idk man, it seems like you have luck worse than me, I can kill any of them from the front or side in a single shot.
It doesn’t, I can One-shot-One-kill any T-Tank, and usually kill most NATO in one, unless my rounds don’t spall or do some goofy penetration stuff then it takes two, maybe three.
So if you have good KDR’s why the hell are you complaining on the internet about things that are seemingly not an issue for you.
Nice flag trying to silence me…
1 Like
Yeah all the videos of planes dodging Pantsirs below 10km is just a skill issue. I already told you that is an almost “perfect” way to handwave any argument thrown at you.
Meanwhile, telling that a tank moving from 11.7 to 12.0 doesn’t matter is simply hilarious, all the more when you want something else change a bit in BR for “balancing”.
Also, do remind me, are you that guy who said driver’s port and LFP aren’t frontal parts of the tank.
1 Like
The spall liner in an Abrams tank is primarily composed of Kevlar, a type of aramid fiber, integrated into the composite armor itself. It’s not a separate layer but rather a component within the armor, designed to absorb and mitigate the effects of spalling
The thing you are referring to is not the same thing i’m talking about.
The only reason why it’s not there, is because its composite armor structure is classified.
That’s the issue, there is no Kevlar spall liner, but there is Kevlar embedded in the composites of the tank.
Sorry for the late response, I’m in glacier national park right now, and had no service all day.
Anyway, people always derive subjective emotions towards some vehicles they genuinely like, and the generation of these emotions can potentially affect your perception of certain things like M1 or leopard 2 perhaps?
And it has been over three months since Smin posted information on their detailed modules for main battle tanks on the forum on March 4th. Is it really difficult for them to add even one new MBT detailed module within three months
Ngl, put it in layman’s terms man, I’m too tired to decipher that right now =P
They just prefer a certain vehicle from certain countries, that’s all
Fair enough
I think I one shot the Abrams about 70-80% of the time when I aim for the turret ring, it’s a pretty consistent 1 shot kill spot if you havbe at least 2 braincells.
5 Likes
At least I have never worried about how to deal with an Abrams. One clear shot to the gun barrel is enough to solve everything, but it is really possible for vehicles without detailed modules to only lose their fuel tanks after being hit
1 Like
The easiest Tank to disable in Top Tier right now is the Abrams, anywhere you shoot you disable the hydraulic pump 99% of the time (30 sec of repair and it needs a fire extinguisher) and the basket which 99% of the time the shot spalls straight to the engine, so here you go “Muh The second best tank in the game”
5 Likes
People act as if we ask for the world instead of consistency, and that just because people think the Abrams isn’t a bad tank, that it doesn’t warrant accurate fixes.
3 Likes
I completely agree with you. For me, realism comes first, and if tank modules need to be added, then I hope the developers prepare them for all tanks, and in the update when everything is complete, they’ll be added for all of them, even the L3-33. I came to War Thunder after many years in WOT, and when I saw that they were going to release a game that was supposedly based on realism, I didn’t think twice and left WOT. For me what the game should be is to use tanks with everything realistic, with their advantages and disadvantages and then act in the games depending on their strengths, that’s why this shit of giving some things to some, not to others and garbage like that to make a fucking shitty balance I don’t like. I don’t care if I lose the tank 100 times and kill 300, or if I lose 100 and kill 230. What I want is for it to be as realistic as possible within a minimum balance.
The best armor is not to be hit… At least the driving experience of the M1 series and the M829A2, which fires every 5 seconds, are very good
1 Like
Nah lets just put it more bluntly, those who refuse to add detailed models to the remaining tanks are actually just because they don’t want their toys to be weakened
3 Likes