Based on this mostly captured vehicles like the T-34(r) 747 should come with limited ammunition, missing modules and stuff alike. Same would be to any future captured vehicles like the T-90A T, with non-functional Shtora-T, misplaced ERA blocks on the side and a boombox with a music blasting during the match.
well
probably germany had enough technology, ammunition and etc for them. since not every captured tank goes into battle. even represented in game(visual)
Ukraine has Kontakt-5 ERA, so, nothing will be wrong with full ERA coverage. Shtora - depends
May Gaijin give USSR the Maus then.
Obviously does, in this subject I’m mentioning the one T-90A brought to USA, I’m not referring to any production model, which, I doubt Ukraine may be manufacturing T-90A when themselves has access to better and vastly superior tecnology. The specified T-90A is, from what I can clearly see on pictures, damaged, but from footages not entirely non-functional.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Oh you wanted all hell breaking loose?
don’t complain later when Brits get your SU-30MKI Mig29 and maybe T-90MS from India.
one… not working at all tank…
it is different case from what i have written.
welp, if youre specificly about one that was brought for US - yes, true, but maybe there is more K-5, since some T-84 were in US and might be still here.
In case of Ukraine - they just dont need such a bad tank, but still can use it. Even upgrade a lot, like an T-80U with T-90M Turret ERA(or T-80BVM), T-80BVM hull side ERA, some sort of unknown(maybe Nizh?) on front part of hull.
*Better Su-30 due of TGP
Look pretty intact and functional to me.
To that same end the US has also taken delivery of a number of other makes of T series tanks including a number of T-90Ms.
Seeing how everyone else is getting Soviet equipment, Gaijin wouldn’t be in the wrong for it +1.
You mean… how they either operated them irl or a sub-nation of theirs did/still does?
Don’t bring up the Swedish T-80U or the maybe upcoming US T-90A as they’re both just whataboutisms.
Opinionated, sure, logitically, it could be added as a premium or event.
-
There are German Shermans.
-
There are Soviet Pz. III’s.
-
There are French Panthers.
It doesn’t even matter at this point, Ukrainian sub tree is inevitable.
The cope. I can smell it through the screen.
There is no cope, you’re the one who replied to my comment.
I’d have assumed he meant the T-90 Bishma as well.
Specifically about the T-84, doesn’t it uses a totally different ERA from Contact-5? Or may be applied on the sideskirts as much other Eastern active main battle tanks.
Just because at somepoint it was seen and recorded driving in a road doesn’t mean it’s operational, also, I’ve mentioned it should be not entirely functional, using the ERA as reference, specifically on the sideskirts,
It doesn’t seems to be in a good state. And if the outside is looking this bad, at least for me I can’t imagine the mess inside. Obvisouly I’m saying this based on a single picture and a footage, I didn’t seen any official report mentioning its reason in USA but research purposes or something related.
1 Like
What niche would a UKR sub-TT even fit into? Please do tell me, as most nations to have received them lacked greatly in one or more aspects, Russia, as one of the largest nations in WT, has no voids to fill and therefore claiming a “UKR sub-TT is a fact”, is in fact, cope.
some of T-84 were using K-5 ERA
As a multi-sub-tech-tree, it should go with a “CCCP” Tree, and rename USSR to Russia.
It will never go to Russia, and no politics.
would be pretty fun when that “sub-tt” would have best tank in game…