In automatic and in fire and observe mode it always target the turrer top, you can only target specific part if you use the manual mode, in fire and observe it just allows you to switch targets but the autopilot still does all the targeting.
the thing is that what you propose doesnt fix the actual issues of the missile, just make it behave like a SAL missile, which actually is unrealistic, and will probably make worse than it is seen how sal behaves
Which is LOBL mode (i hope theres no confusion abt that)
Which can be LOAL mode, and this, as shown by the video appended in the first post, shows that the missile does not always lock automatically and the ginner can adjust the point of impact.
Oh?
Being able to decide where 900mm of penetration go is a disadvantage?
Fire and observe is not manual. I hope that this is clear, for fire and obsever it is still a LOBL mode, it just allows you to swich tagets.
In a small warhead and seen how wonky SAL is it does…
Bruh
NLOS by definition is LOAL lmao
Please see the video about spikes attached in the first post.
What the heck is that, thats suck a joke i could understand mybe a tv screen view but thats just silly
The Fire and Observe mode is a LOS mode… at the start of the video it clearely shows it, “Lanzamiento en modalidad dispara y observa” and right below it says “se engancha en un primer objetivo y en vuelo se cambia a otro diferente”, in this context “se engancha” would mean to lock on, which you can see at the start, and for that you need have LOS, so it is a LOBL mode like on the fire and forget mode, After that it shows the actual LOAL mode which they call it “Modo manual”, that is actual NLOS mode.
Bruh all that text just to arrive at my very point smh
And where u reading all this spanish wtv from lol.
It aint in the video
Buddy, you were claiming that Fire and observe mode is an LOAL which is not that the manual mode this are two different things.
it is literally in the video…
Well yeah but im sure that there are also Radio guided ones. also it would be historically accurate to put jammers on tanks since russia and also ukrain are putting them on theri tanks roght now (im not sure about ukraine though).
The jammers that russia uses are mainy against the comercial drones they are not really meant to be against missiles like the spike that would either have optical fiber or datalink, for the ones with data link you will probably need the larger specialized vehicles that russia is also fielding not just the small jammers that they have installed in the tanks.
ah ok.
That’s, interesting, that was April fools?
Also, is that just the normal RB-55 being used?
fire and observe is not restricted as you think it is bro.
you can lock and fire and observe or you can fire without lock and observe.
if you want three modes of operation be my guest, i just want as much effectiveness with as much realism with the least amount of hassle for both the devs and the players
those are added by other people, cannot exactly put that up as source worthy
expect what you propose is not realistic… and it is far more of a hassle for both players and players when changing the guidance parameter and loft would be first easier and second far more effective than just adding a pseudo SAL mode which would not fix any of the actual issues of the missile.
it is a video form the official channel of the spanish army…
iirc it was a regular bug, some mix up code from the acual aprils fools event
Odd, i was new to the game then, but remember the event
which are made not by technics but their PR team etc.
the issues of the spikes rn are
it is still from an official source, so unless you have evidence that what it shows it is actually false, what youre saying is quite irrelevant, which btw we actually see exactly what it shows in the video, and you can clearely see when it launches on the fire and observe mode and when it is launched on theactual LOAL mode as it literally say “manual” in the video feed of the missile.
well the solution for either of those is not adding a different unrealistic mechanic…
gaijing has made changes about the missile they fell short on those changes but saying that they have refused to do so is also false
Yeah sure why not, eventually they’ll need to add Akeron MP with that too if so
