About reloading time for T80 variants... @T-80BVM

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
23

Exactly. I thought that the BRs were supposed to reflect the vehicle, why artificially (Ahistorically) nerf its reload to balance it.
That is literally why the BRs exist so things can move up or down based on balance.

For example shir 2, its getting L23 , because smin says, “where we want to place it BR wise”
But its not getting access to the L23A1 round which is exactly the same and both have the same service date due to being the same round.

Or the type 10 or leclerc reloads? why theyre so slow compared to IRL , Balance? well if it makes them better move them up in BR.

Dunno why its so stagnant all of a sudden, queue times are the shortest they have ever been

1 Like
24

I dont wanna type 100words so,
T90M
+good UFP
+Gen 3 thermal
+ERA
-no reverse
-no gun depression
-bad mobility
-can lol pen from front
-Less powerful APFSDS (compared to other counterparts)
-7 sec reload
-Auto loader
-large exposed breech
so yeah its kinda hard to play top tire russia.

I’m not taking any sides. I actually wanted to grind Sweden, but they don’t have a 10.3 GE premium tank.

What ragebait? I just asked a question.

draco

3 Likes
25

T-80BVM is better, since it is way faster and has more reverse

Not a -, since it love to eat shells

1 Like
26

Your activity in the forum clearly shows you have at the very least a favoritism. Go ragebait someone else.

5 Likes
27

Yeah, because I play Ground Russia, and I know it’s not as good as people think and USA mains actually cry more than other nations; everyone knows that.

You’re the one who’s ragebaiting mate.

2 Likes
28

Still looks to be stronger than the Ariete, Challenger 2/3, Merkava, Type 90/10 and Chinas top tier tanks (never recall their name).

Also, T-90, bad Mobility… really?

Clearly has never played a Challenger 2

8 Likes
29

Yeah, 4 km/h in reverse sounds bad to me.

nope

I was comparing it to the Abrams.

1 Like
30

Yeah, figured.

its much slower, has way less armour and makes the “large exposed breach” on the T-90 look microscopic

31

T90 goes 60kmph no? the CR2 goes 59.
but is so much fatter isnt it xD

1 Like
32

In theory, the sheer weight though means you take an age to accelerate and the low torque screws you on any inclines.

4 Likes
33

also lose far more in the turns as well BTW dont forget it likes to piss its speed away faster than any other top tier MBT last i checked.

CR2 reload past the first four rounds is also slower than the T90s unless you have aced the crew.

2 Likes
34

Isn’t it only applied to manual loaded vehicles?

35

I’m not sure but i think i’ve seen at least a small bit of it on the automatics as well. Mostly because of the argument that they “can” go faster but it will break the mechanism if used that way continuously for to many shots in a row (or something like that) so they won’t use that faster setting in game (again, i’m unsure about this and i’m going straight of memory).

37

It was applied to the HSTV-L, as it could still theoretically fire faster. They did get it to fire at 120 rpm. Did it work well? Not really. But they did do it. HSTV-L is just the best example I can think of for this.

1 Like
38

Reloading balances the game as well as shells (fake crowbar 238), and they can’t come up with another balance system, just play other Gaijin games and you’ll see how bad they are at it.

39

It can be applied for all vehicles including autoloaders as I understand, if their reloading times vary.

40

Don’t worry, they’ll give him everything after the marathon and send him to 10-10.3. All Gaijin does is sell a lowered BR, justify this balance, and then after a while give the correct one.

41

What?

42

You cant just go every forums and dismiss all of the forums arguement because your tank in arguement has -4km/h reverse speed when you have decent round, good armor, good forward speed, low silhouette, lineups also has good stuff when the tank u comparing it to (abrums) has good mobility, good round, big ass weak spot, no hull armor, easily get overpressure by atgm(did u know this?) and big ass silhouette and every other abrams is just copy and paste with improved turret armor
Not to mention u always say T-90 when T-80 are slightly less armor but faster(faster than any abrams) forward and still has good armor to face against respective round in the BRs

43

Why isn’t it true?

The same goes for T-series tanks.

Still, the Abrams has better mobility than the T-80.

What good is the armor if even a DM23 can one shot it from the front?

1 Like