About more "detailed" turret modules for some western MBTs

[皇道派おじゃる丸]

Hello there! I’m gonna talk about more detailed modules.
In the next major update “Hornet’s sting” some western MBTs about to get extremely huge NERF. [examples below]

live server :

dev server:

I think this is unfair. More and more detailed modules are being added to tanks that have enough module information, while tanks such as Type 90 receive almost no nerf. There are tanks like obj292 :

that have not even received moduled autoloaders. Also, according to Gaijin theory, there are hit boxes even in areas (crew chairs and baskets) that would not normally affect the operation of the turret.
Is this really called module refinement? Furthermore, isn’t it against your “realism” that Abrams and others have been unfairly nerfed their armor and have not received “realistic” armor?
Also, any further deterioration would be a major barrier to making MBT battlefields an esports discipline. We do not want to play ultra realistic simulators like steel beasts.

Best regards, 皇道派おじゃる丸

[mm10000]

@皇道派おじゃる丸

here are tanks like obj292

If you make Soviet tanks more detailed, they almost always become stronger. Want realistic armor? Me too. I believe that the Object 292 should receive its T-80BV armor package.

[Necrons31467]

@mm10000

I believe that the Object 292 should receive its T-80BV armor package.

That’s literally what it has.

[mm10000]

Missing some ERA blocks

[皇道派おじゃる丸]

The T-80BV can of course be equipped with the K-1, but 292 was never equipped with ERA.
This is just a prototype and I am referring to the modules inside tank

[mm10000]

Object 292

poll [image] HISTORY: Object 292 was a Russian experimental tank that was designed and made by the design bureau of the Kirov Plant. The prototype was based on the T-80U tank turret, and the chassi was the T-80BV with slight modifications done to it. The T-80U turret got its gun removed and was modified to house a 152.4 smoothbore gun. It was made so that it can destroy any NATO tank in any distance at that time. [image] DESIGN: The tank like said before was using the turret of a T-80U a…

@AtlasLaion

Object 292 was a Russian experimental tank that was designed and made by the design bureau of the Kirov Plant. The prototype was based on the T-80U tank turret, and the chassi was the T-80BV with slight modifications done to it

[Necrons31467]

Object 292 did not mount Kontakt-1 blocks.

T-80BV designates the glacis composite array, and the in-game Object 292 uses the T-80BV’s composite armour.

[mm10000]

Knowing the russians it was probably striped to be actually be puted to use (the era blocks)

[皇道派おじゃる丸]

as you know, T-80BV can be equiped with K-1, but never implemented on 292

[Byhesher]

Are there any changes to other mbts, such as abrams and merkava.

[Conte_Baracca]

@皇道派おじゃる丸

I think this is unfair.

It’s not only unfair, it’s completely unrealistic.

[Kingtiez]

jammable blast doors for bustle ammunition would’ve been cool to see.

[皇道派おじゃる丸]

interesting

[Misaka19802]

There is no main battle tank that requires something similar, and the turret basket as part of the member’s activity space will not affect the horizontal drive of the turret at all. This is completely Gaijin’s intentional smear. This is neither realistic nor conducive to the characteristics and balance of the game. The so-called ‘internal refinement’ was initially agreed upon by players to introduce the game in order to reduce the significantly unrealistic high survivability of light tanks, but now gaijin has turned it into a tool for disgusting players, and all of this must stop.

[Biscat88]

I admit, this is a completely malicious design!!!

[Thenighthunter]

You hit the blast doors the ammo is deting in game.

[Cygnus_X_1]

@皇道派おじゃる丸

I think this is unfair. More and more detailed modules are being added to tanks that have enough module information, while tanks such as Type 90 receive almost no nerf. There are tanks like obj292 :

that have not even received moduled autoloaders. Also, according to Gaijin theory, there are hit boxes even in areas (crew chairs and baskets) that would not normally affect the operation of the turret.
Is this really called module refinement? Furthermore, isn’t it against your “realism” that Abrams and others have been unfairly nerfed their armor and have not received “realistic” armor?
Also, any further deterioration would be a major barrier to making MBT battlefields an esports discipline. We do not want to play ultra realistic simulators like steel beasts.

This is actually a very good change. Originally, WT was a game with a stronger simulator aspect compared to WoT.

So, I have no objection to preserving the identity of this game.

If you want to play casual e-sports, there are plenty of other games for that. If that’s what you’re looking for, you should play a more suitable game.

The same goes for map design. I’m sick of the terrible designs we’ve been getting lately.

[LAV-25plz]

casual e-sports is an oxymoron, I want a game that has the simplicity and content of war thunder with the infuriating PvP setup.

[Cygnus_X_1]

Then all the more reason to bring WT closer to its earlier versions.
Maps had more open terrain, and penetrating shells would ricochet inside the vehicle, taking out crew members and modules.

Back in the CBT days, there were some unfair mechanics, but it felt realistic and was a lot of fun.

[皇道派おじゃる丸]

Thanks for the reply. It is my job to clean up the mess of players like you who keep camping in the back