A-10 damage model Dones not match the one in real life

Only the soviets built their aircraft out of Stalinium

5 Likes

I feel so fucked up whenever I get hit in the elevator get starts to nosedive

It’s also worth considering the missiles that are in question.

Until very recently most of the Soviet missiles used in their WT vehicles were relatively large weapons like the Strela, the Pantsir, the OSA. While the NATO forces were using significantly smaller warheads

Stingers or their variants, Mistrals, Starstreaks etc.

That means the SU was mostly taking hits from smaller warheads.

Then there’s the issue with the modeling of western missiles…

1 Like

you are big brain

A10 is rated against 23mm. Its tanky even if we forget about redundant control aurfaces.
The fact the su25 is more tanky ingame is ridiculous lmao

2 Likes

real

Survivorship bias strikes again

there is a decent bit of survivorship bias when talking about the a10, but its still an extreme sturdy aircraft, the real surivorship bias is related to the su25.

I’m pretty sure that the A-10 is more sturdy than the SU-25 but the Su-25 is a smaller harder target to hit.

no such thing as smaller aircraft unless youre crazy small. missile doesnt care

Due to how Gajin implemented the Su-25, missiles targeting it will detonate too far resulting in a very low probability of a 1-shot kill.

1 Like

Su-25 is more sturdy, A-10 is just designed to minimize damage.

I thought the A-10 could take more damage