he thinks this is a fixed plate radar
1 Like
isn’t that a deritative of klj-7? Thought the j-10c used klj-10a or something
idk
but thats what gaijin modeled in the X-Ray
1 Like
i mean if gaijin modeled it as a gimbaling aesa it shoiuld be much mroe than ±85 lol.
Though no sources so it probably wont be changed
depends on the angle it is mounted at
if it is mounted at a 15° angle and then rotating, the 85° limit makes sense
1 Like
Gaijin is incredibly stupid; they actually think this is fixed?
no they dont think that
that is why the J-10C has more than 70° gimbal
That’s an unrealistic buff.
1 Like
get your translator working properly
first you are complaining that gaijin is thinking that the radar is a fixed one
and yet it has a higher gimbal limit than fixed AESAs
that looks like a fixed plate radar. is that the j10c’s radar ?
it is.
lmao instead of adding the better engines they want to add a fake radar. i dont even know what gaijin is thinking.
2 Likes
watch them, they will add better engine too
would comical if they make every ESA radar ±85* in wt cus of this 1 change.
again the x-ray model is not of an fixed plate AESA
1 Like
then x-ray is wrong. lol
It should just be nerfed. Its not impossible for AESAs scan past 60 degrees, but tbe performance degradation is immense. You’d be lucky to get a lock a few kilometers away.
my guess is that gaijin just gave it something similar to this:
(which is a gimbaled AESA)
and is calling it a day now
GAIJIN got many facts wrong, but they used the excuse that “news report/photos cannot be used as evidence” to close many issues that attempted to point out their mistakes.
Good