I’m not saying Zunis aren’t good. But they still require a direct hit like 95% of the time even against open tops, or a very near miss.
2 Likes
So stop shooting the strongest parts of their armor?
1 Like
Again, we have a very different opinion on zunis.
I find them extremely good, being capable of overpressure even heavy tanks.
Tbf I haven’t tried them on the L-39 but having used them with the Mb326 I can only imagine how broken they are.
2 Likes
yk its hard to hit a small spot which still has over 200 mm of armour and when its angled its even worse (most of the armour on the ho-ri is made up of over 230mm of armour) so stop cherry picking the spots that can be shot its clearly you want to keep the op ho-ri like it is today if you’re bad in the ho-ri then seriously dont play warthunder
Actually, now that I look closer, T29 is a great comparison for this “fictional reload time that’s too fast”.
Like Ho-Ri, T29 also has two loaders and a very good 105mm gun. However, the gun loading is unassisted, they have very limited space inside the turret, and are mostly stuck in a sitting position. Ammoracks are spread across the tank in various places.
Ho-Ri’s loaders have enough space to stand up and walk around, with the ammo right under and around them. Once they pick up a shell, they just have to put it on the loading tray and tilt it in in front of the breech. The rest of the process was automated.
The Ho-Ri is massive and so are all those areas. The transmission can be penetrated and taken out in a single shot even by Shermans.
7.3 CCIP Zunis are cheese
but the Ho-Ri? Seriously?
1 Like
Well I’m a long time enjoyer of them, but for some reason I find them less… precise than before.
Maybe it is because of the way slower speed of the aircraft when you use them,
but it is very hard to get a direct hit on a moving target at >2km.
60 / 10 = 6
the reloading speed of the ho-ri is made up. clearly you’re glazing the tank because your kd on it is over 4 and you still tell me its not that op
Really? With the Mb326 you can snipe players even without CCIP and the speed of the two aircraft is similar.
1 Like
- Worse pen and longer reload than a German long 88
- Flat armour
- Casemate
I’ve heard enough clearly OP is right and the Ho-Ri is equal to the M103/Conqueror/IS-4
1 Like
10 / 60 is not 6. Go back to maths class.
But even 6s is still faster than its Aced reload time (8.6s). 12rpm is a 5s reload.
Source?
It’s called “being good at the game”. My k/d on Chi-Nu II is something like that too. Are you gonna claim the Chi-Nu II is somehow broken OP as well?
every ho-ri player is good with it if you’re not then youre very bad at the game i bet if i had to try it out i would get 5 or more kills per game
there is no source of the reload being 11 seconds
Well with your logic, irl it could shoot 10-12 times per minutes so it’s around 6sec.
I have a good k/d on it mainly because I’ve been playing it for ages ? My average k/d on any thank is 1.44, so I know the game. And I have 650 battles with a tank, so yeah of course I know it by hearth. I would even say that I’m way more reliable than you to think if it needs a BR change. Spoiler: absolutely not. I don’t want to face ever again Turm-III or VT1-2.
I remember the time I was dying by the newly added WMA-301, lrg+thermal+apfsds agianst a Ho-Ri… nightmare.
With the same logic, you can see that I have a k/d of 3+ on the Heavy Tank No°VI… Does it mean that all the tiger I should move from 5.7/6.0 to 6.7 ?
ok but consider: rocket aimbot
Yeah you are right
It is too slow
Same as for all Japanese WW2 37-105mm guns
2 Likes
do you think i want to meet you in my jumbo and t20 in the ho-ri?
yeah its too slow for the t29 too bro sure
Really not matter at all