Surely we are all adults here…
3 Likes
I’ll just close the poll now
I used to share this assumption, but I’m not so sure anymore.
2 Likes
1 Like
It would appear, we infact, are NOT adults here.
3 Likes
+1
Slightly copy+pastey, but its a historically significant vehicle for North Korean tank development. We also need to have the base vehicle if we are going to get all the unique variants too.
2 Likes
We’re not, we’re grown ahh kids
1 Like
No. just no. I can already imagine the in game chat with this one
1 Like
I come back every few days to remind people of this meme of a vehicle
1 Like
Only when there is a Korean TT.
I think the kids have already stopped using it.
how are we going to name this in-game?
I don’t think just… " ̶6̶7̶" will be fitting. Does North Korea have some other stuff to add to the name?
Spoiler
+1 too, it was just a question of mine
1 Like
hard to not say those two numbers… +1 btw
I don’t know why it wouldn’t work. We already have vehicles with short names (albeit none with just two numbers), like 120S, 2S1, D2, etc. 67 would be fine. Can’t really have any other name, since there’s no way to shorten 1967-model amphibious tank ‘67’ other than just 67. Or ‘1967 amphibious tank’.
But, knowing Gaijin, they’ll call it Object 1967 or something just as ridiculous.
why