Therefore, I believe the early variants of the F-22 should be placed between the F-15C and the F-15EX, while the more modern variants should be top-tier. Alternatively, the different versions could be folded/collapsed (into sub-variants).
1 Like
Yea adding all 4.5 is mandatory i was just stating examples of what we currently have
1 Like
I’m not really sure the F-35C is even necessary as currently it would just be a worse F-35A kinda like the Rafale M would be a worse Rafale C
1 Like
F-35B for britain is going to be after the FA 2 imo
1 Like
By the way, Britain could also receive F-35A if Australia was a subtree
1 Like
Judging by how the UK hasn’t recieved australian hornets yet, I doubt it
1 Like
For Britain, The F-35B would either go after the Sea Harrier FA2 as a naval aircraft or after the Harrier Gr9A (yet to be added) in the strike aircraft line.
If britain were to decide to get F-35Cs then that may go either in line 1 after the Typhoon FGR4 as a multi-role or in Line 4 after the Harrier Gr9A as a strike aircraft
1 Like
Maybe, but we really dont need it.
Lies. We need more Australian kit, and to stop the Australian kit going to the yanks. I do not seek to lose yet another one of our bits of kits to the yank tree.
I was more thinking it probably wont be added anywhere. as the Yanks can get a F-35A from the Yanks.
Could be the SQV or something, but Britain specifically wouldnt suffer without the Penal version of the F-35 :P
But better ANZAC / Canadian treatment would be good
Stop!
It is Vehicle pls get it right and change your mistake.
I have gramatical troubles :)
… grammar
1 Like
lul
… lol
For Japan i can see F-35A after F-15JM maybe? But what about F-35B?
your’reyre*
I suspect theyll be somewhere at the end of the line
True, gajinn put out a statement stating stealth wasent planned for this end of the year update, never said it WASENT planed or WILL not come.
Is WASENT! You heard hiem guis