5th generation veicules placement in tech trees

I know gajinn doesnt want us to talk about the leaks so lets ignored those for this context specifically (kinda) but here a NEEDED list of which fifth gen goes into wich lines.

The common to everyone jack of all trades F35A for all nations that get it of course should if theres one be placed after f16s, as its its literral replacement it can only make sens.

F35B spinny one should be placed where VTOLS are or as a replacement of the current aircraft its supposed to replace in the waters of earth example being av8 to f35b

F35C is pretty self explanatory, its the carrier capable naval one made for hard landings, as such anything in the style of the f18 line should be where it goes

For the other more specific doombringers

F22a now this one is… hard to explain since most line in the usa decided to have a toptier jet that doesn’t correspond, example being the f15c line…but i suppose it should go there, as of the yf23 i think it should honestly be a squadron veicule

Su57 is pretty easy to set. After whatever comes after the su30sm

J20 is up to the community choice

One thing that should be respected imo is the usa lineup being

F16c-F35a
F15c -F22a
AV8B-F35B
F18C-F35C

And maybe even

F15E-YF23/F15EX

1 Like

J-20 would go after J-11B, 2 engine heavy fighter.
F-35s after F-16AM [France], F-2A, Typhoon [Italy], F-16C Block 40, F-18C [Sweden], Typhoon [Germany], and Britain is really either line.

1 Like

In my humble opinion, we should first integrate the other 4++ gen aircraft, and especially their electronic warfare versions, between the current top tiers and the respective 5th gen aircraft.
Obviously, this does not apply to:
The F35Bs, which are the direct successors to the Harriers in the US, UK, and Italy
The F35As, which are successors to various versions of the F-16 for all users

But in the following cases, and given the current top tiers:
F-15C → F-22, I think the F-15EX Eagle II should be included between the two
F/A-18C+ → F-35C, I think the F/A-18E/F should be included, then the E/A-18G should be included between the two.
SU-30SM → SU-57, I think the SU-35S should be included before the SU-57
YF-23 maybe should be Squadron

For the specific case of China, it would be necessary to create a new tree end, the naval branch that would start with the J-15 and end at the naval J-35.
Complementing the JH-7A branch with the J-16 and J-16D wich gives place in a more or less distant future for the next 5th gen strike aircraft after them.
Ending the J-11B line by the J-20, but adding J-11D between them.
Ending the J-10A line by the J-35A, but adding the J-10C between them.

1 Like

Many fifth-generation aircraft already have different versions. We should make finer distinctions. For example, early versions of the F-22 should face fourth-generation fighters with a lower rating, as these early variants lacked the AIM-9X and helmet-mounted sighting system. Conversely, the more modernized versions should be considered the true top tier, matching up against other top-tier fighters (the J-20 is the same in this regard).

1 Like

Therefore, I believe the early variants of the F-22 should be placed between the F-15C and the F-15EX, while the more modern variants should be top-tier. Alternatively, the different versions could be folded/collapsed (into sub-variants).

1 Like

Yea adding all 4.5 is mandatory i was just stating examples of what we currently have

1 Like

I’m not really sure the F-35C is even necessary as currently it would just be a worse F-35A kinda like the Rafale M would be a worse Rafale C

1 Like

F-35B for britain is going to be after the FA 2 imo

1 Like

By the way, Britain could also receive F-35A if Australia was a subtree

1 Like

Judging by how the UK hasn’t recieved australian hornets yet, I doubt it

1 Like

For Britain, The F-35B would either go after the Sea Harrier FA2 as a naval aircraft or after the Harrier Gr9A (yet to be added) in the strike aircraft line.

If britain were to decide to get F-35Cs then that may go either in line 1 after the Typhoon FGR4 as a multi-role or in Line 4 after the Harrier Gr9A as a strike aircraft

Maybe, but we really dont need it.

Lies. We need more Australian kit, and to stop the Australian kit going to the yanks. I do not seek to lose yet another one of our bits of kits to the yank tree.

I was more thinking it probably wont be added anywhere. as the Yanks can get a F-35A from the Yanks.

Could be the SQV or something, but Britain specifically wouldnt suffer without the Penal version of the F-35 :P

But better ANZAC / Canadian treatment would be good

Stop!
It is Vehicle pls get it right and change your mistake.

I have gramatical troubles :)

… grammar

1 Like

lul

… lol

For Japan i can see F-35A after F-15JM maybe? But what about F-35B?