You are so close to understanding…
Because CR2 is the best tank in the game. You won’t change my mind
Is I-TOW AESA
And i can still say BVM better than both despite i do better in both of the tanks
Look who’s talking 💀🙏
You can call me whatever you want but the truth is i have like 7 nation at top tier so i well damn know what i’m talking about than you do
Wow okay, the moment it starts looking like you’re losing the argument of facts, reason and logic, you defaulted to stats. Pot kettle black I guess, considering you have 0 games in the Bhishma, and 0 games in the T-90A. You have no games at rank 6 or above in Britain, so you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about there, and your only rank 6 in Russia is a T-55AM-1, so you can’t have played the T-90A.
If I’m so “unqualified” to talk about the T-90, and the Challenger, then I suppose you shouldn’t even be in this thread.
Edit: In the original comment, you stated that you suspected I played my Challenger Mk.3 a long time ago. I’m afraid you’re wrong in that regard. I’ve only just got L26 and only got the tank after Christmas. I do not play in consistent patterns, so my account would look inactive quite a bit.
You clearly aren’t comprehending the fact that the Bhishma is a T90
which is a Russian vehicle with modifications.
In case you didn’t notice, I have actually played mine.
I mean if that’s so that’s apples and oranges considering further up you demonstrated a lack of numeracy and literacy skills.
Okay, you have 40 games combined in all Russian-esque vehicles. I have hundreds.
Within those games, you did worse than in British vehicles of the same BR, in a vehicle that’s directly better than its equivalent in the actual Russian tree.
That why i ask him how do he know ? when he don’t have even a single high tier British tank
Top Tier meta still relies heavily on mobility, which T90 and T72 lacks severly.
It also very easy dies to lower front plate shots, which you can’t cover because of lack of gun depression.
All tanks are very clearly divided into “Western” and “Eastern” designs.
British tanks are certainly not as good as the Abrams/Leopard 2s, but they share similar rough characteristics, and they all have the exact same crew layout.
So does the Challenger
yes, but it has usable depression nd reverse, huge difference.
And is alot bigger with a bigger lfp
Can’t go five minutes without trying to insult someone over their WT stats. Has the thought crossed your mind that him having double the amount of matches in the Chally means he has much more matches in it spaded compared to the Bhishma? Fire is a much better grb player than me, but I probably wouldn’t have finished spading a 10.0+ vehicle after 47 spawns. Surely even you must be able to understand how using a vehicle with all the modifications unlocked will improve performance, no?
I genuinely hope that whatever is going on in your life starts to reward you and give you some agency, so that you no longer feel the need to behave like this online.
I don’t care enough to look up your stats, but I’m willing to wager I have more matches in 10.0+ Russian vehicles than you do.
You’d be more respectable if you stopped trying to gaslight others about Russia having bad vehicles and calling overperforming ones like the T-90 bad. Much of Russia overperforms. We have gone over this in-depth yet folks like you deny the hard evidence and try to gaslight.
You’d be better off stopping such behavior altogether.
If you want to continue to play Russia alot because you’re bad and/or lazy that’s your call - Same goes for everyone else - But don’t expect any semblance of respect for it in-game or in the forums.
I won’t make any claims on TryHarding to improve or anything - With how rigged and unbalanced the game is there’s no point. However, I still have enough pride as a gamer to not indulge in cheating myself out of a proper experience through doing things like using ULQ or playing Russia every single day of the week.
Lmfao. How compelling.
“Bu-but it’s not the same! The bishma it’s from india it’s obviously different!”