1 Like
Internal modules are released in batches and not every vehicle that should have them has got them yet, if you look at the update history for the recent major updates then you can see that there has been a couple of vehicles that got their new internal modules each major update.
2 Likes
Would it be needed? The vehicle’s armor is so awful, some times playing with it is very frustrating, you get shoot in the fire control system and you can’t do absolutely nothing to reply, because a tank destroyer in War Thunder should be put in a 200m/square urban map.
1 Like
yes. it would be needed. the stryker has its autoloader modeled. 2s25M shouldnt even be in its current br… It should be higher.
better shell + faster autoloader + better mobility
its just allround better than the stryker yet the stryker is 10.3 and the 2s25 is 10.0
4 Likes
But thats not a good excuse for it not having the autoloader? The T-80 autoloader wasnt missing and added recently beacous gajin wants accurate internals? The stryker is comperable to The sprut but still a higher br but tye differences still is that tye strykers autoloader has been accurately modeled for a long time and didnt need to be added recently.
I don’t know what your point is here and i’m having trouble understanding a lot of your post.
Point is that it should have had its autoloader modeled a while ago? Like multiple other vehicles released before gajin started adding detailed internals.
I think autoloaders were only modeled on autocannons before the start of the addition of the detailed internals , not on large caliber canons, i’m not certain though and might be wrong.
There’s still some autoloader vehicles still being worked on. 2S25’s, AGS, Turm 3, etc
Internal modules is such a large project, not all vehicles can be worked on once.