air rb
sagittario 2
9.3 > 9.0
no AA msl
speed is under of mach 1
sagittario and ariete is in same br but ariete engine kgf is over 760 kgf than sagittario
The top tier SPAA, especially Pansir, should go 12.0 too as they are “top tier”, and it is absolutely nonsense that Pansir stays with other SPAA with the same br. Best radar, best missile, one of the best 30mm guns, best number of missile. How can Pansir stay the same br as other SPAAs do?
F-4J. 12.0 > 11.7 (realistic)
Bad maneuver, bad ir missiles, RWR can’t detect any missiles coming at them. No match for planes like F-14, mig-29. It sees Aim-120, Fakour-90, Aim-54, R-27ER but unable to detect. It has same BR with F-4S with better maneuvers, mirage F1 with IRCCM missiles and better maneuvers.
This aircraft has all the bad points of the F-4J family:
-Uses the original and weaker J79 engine of the US phantoms instead of the British tech tree Phantoms’ RR Spey
-Heavier Vulcan gun pod affects maneuverability more than the tech tree British Phantoms
-Does not have VTAS HMD of which US Navy Phantoms get
-Uses Skyflash(DF) vs AIM-7F of US Navy Phantoms
-Gets 60 countermeasures instead of 90 on British tech tree Phantoms
-Doesn’t get Agile eagle slats that F-4S gets
Why is this poor thing at same BR as the F-4S?? Really don’t know…
Realistic. Pansir S1, 11.7 ->12.0
Pansir S1은 지금 다른 대공 장비들보다 성능이 지나치게 좋다. 우월한 레이더, 뛰어난 미사일 추적 능력과 사거리, 강력한 30mm 기관포등 현재 압도적인 대공 능력을 보여주고 있다. 다른 나라들보다 현대적인 이 대공 장비가 동등한 BR에 있다는 것은 언밸런싱하다.
Air Realistic, F8U-2. 10.0 > 10.3~10.7
Supersonic, 4 missiles which is good for its rank, Countermeasures, and decent maneuverability make it very difficult to take on even similarly ranked airframes.
ARB, all Mirage F1C variants, 12.0 > 11.7
It has two magic 2 missiles but other missiles(R530F, 530E) are useless.
And its bombs got nerfed so it is to hard for it to bomb bases.
how about giving it Matra R530D?
RB/ C.202EC 4.0->3.3~3.7
C.202EC, which suffered the most damage due to this, has a battle rating of a whopping 4.0.
Although the high magazine capacity of the 20mm MG151 cannon is a clear advantage, it is very unreasonable to engage with most up-tier aircraft, which are superior in all aspects compared to the flight performance of the maximum speed of 571 km/h.
The speed is slow and the climb is mediocre. Also, due to the nerf to turn time, mobility is also very slow, so it will be very difficult for beginners to play C202EC.
If BR change is difficult, improvement in flight performance is urgently needed.
The C202EC was the most difficult aircraft I have flown.
It has a low-power engine and does not have outstanding maneuverability, making it very difficult to engage with higher-level aircraft.
The P-36G with the same BR 2.3 has the same top speed as the C.200, more firepower, more ammunition, and better mobility.
C.200 It is overall inferior even to the P-36C in 1.7.
I think BR 2.0 is the most suitable for the C.200.Users who have ridden the C.200 will all know this.
Incomprehensible battle rating settings.
C.200 BR 2.3 → 2.0~1.7
The Bf109E3 has a top speed of over 560, has an autocannon, and is very agile. what 2.3??
Yak1 is also equipped with a 20mm cannon and has a top speed of 577km/h and agile mobility. → what 2.3?
Even most other aircraft are superior to the C.200.
So why is C.200 in 2.3?
Gaijin clearly hates Italy X(
