BMP-30: Bulgaria's Improved IFV

Would you like the BMP-30 to be added to the game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
How should it be added?
  • Tech Tree
  • Premium
  • Event
  • Battlepass
  • Squadron
  • I said no
0 voters
What BR should it have?
  • 7.7
  • 8.0
  • 8.3
  • 8.7
  • Other (comment)
  • I said no
0 voters
Who should receive it?
  • USSR
  • Future Balkan Tree
  • Other
  • I said no
0 voters

BMP-30: Bulgaria's Improved IFV

bulgarian-bmp-30-its-an-ifv-based-on-the-chassis-of-the-2s1-v0-25ee8ub075kc1

History:

Following the adoption of the BMP-23 by Bulgaria as a replacement for the BMP-1, it soon became apparent that the 23mm 2A14 autocannon just wasn’t going to be enough as a main armament. Not only that, but the 9M14 ATGM was quickly becoming outdated. It was determined that an upgrade solution needed to happen, and there was one candidate which had been in the sights of the Bulgarian military for a while. Parallel to Bulgaria’s development, the USSR had also seen the BMP-1 become outmoded, resulting in the creation of the much more advanced BMP-2. With its 30mm 2A42 autocannon and 9M113 Konkurs ATGM, it was a vast improvement over the original and changed the world of IFV design. Upon comparing their own design with the Soviet equivalent, a possible upgrade path was noted.

Bulgaria managed to acquire several BMP-2 turrets, mounting them in place of original BMP-23 turrets, creating an up-gunned and overall improved vehicle. This was dubbed the BMP-30, reflecting the new main gun, and it was tested for full-scale production. Unfortunately, due to budgetary constraints it was not pursued, with only the first 10 pre-production examples having been built. That said, they went into service alongside the standard BMP-23s, with the BMP-23A upgrade coming along as a more cost-effective solution to their issues.
NOTE: Forecast International’s report on the BMP-23 family of vehicles claims that upwards of 130 serial production BMP-30s may have been produced. Whether or not this is true is unclear, as all other sources indicate it did not go into serial production.

Description:

The BMP-30 is identical in all aspects to the BMP-23 aside from the turret. Instead of the angular, welded turret made domestically by Bulgaria, it now features the complete turret of the BMP-2, giving it access to all its weapons and features. This includes the 30mm 2A42 autocannon, 9M113 Konkurs ATGM, six smoke grenade launchers, passive NVDs, and larger IR spotlight. Using curved plates instead of flat ones improves the likelihood of ricochets, and the turret itself is overall shorter, making it a smaller target.

Aside from that, the rest is the same. It still uses the same modified 2S1 chassis, the same hull armor, the same crew of 3, and the same engine. It functions essentially like a larger, slower, and less cramped BMP-2.

Specifications:

Spoiler

Main Armament: 30mm 2A42 autocannon, 9M113 Konkurs ATGM

Secondary Armament: 7.62mm PKT machine gun

Armor: 23mm RHA frontally, 20mm RHA sides

Ammo Count: 500 30mm rounds, 2000 7.62mm rounds, 4 missiles

Engine: YaMZ-288V V8 Diesel, 315HP

Transmission: Manual, 6 forward/1 reverse

Top Speed: 62 km/h (38 mph) on land, 6 km/h (3.7 mph) in water

Gun Movement: -4/+74°

Sights: Gunner’s sight: 6x, Commander’s sight: 5x

Crew: 3 (driver, gunner, commander)

Smoke: ESS and 6x smoke launchers

NVDs: Passive IR for gunner and commander, IR spotlight

Gallery:

Spoiler

bulgarian-bmp-30-its-an-ifv-based-on-the-chassis-of-the-2s1-v0-55fawjf075kc1
bulgarian-bmp-30-its-an-ifv-based-on-the-chassis-of-the-2s1-v0-7wparmj075kc1
bulgarian-bmp-30-its-an-ifv-based-on-the-chassis-of-the-2s1-v0-ij4zz8m075kc1


bmp-30_sfkjh

If there is anything I have missed or gotten incorrect, please let me know! I hope you enjoyed reading this, and I hope you will also check out my other suggestions! Thanks, and have a great day.


Sources:

Spoiler

https://army-guide.com/eng/product.php?prodID=1406
BMP-23 - Wikipedia
https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=1030
Bulgarian infantry fighting vehicles of the BMP-23 family

3 Likes

+1 whish we saw more Bulgarian stuff

1 Like

Lets bring this to Italy, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria should all go there togethere!

1 Like

My dream would have been to feature this as an extra to a Visegrad 4 tech tree with Ukraine as the sub-tree, personally. But since Bulgaria is also considered Balkan by some measures, it could fit in with Yugoslavia as well.

2 Likes

There’s a better alternative:

Bulgaria could be a part of an Independent Romanian TT where Bulgaria could either be a subtree or a co-TT with Romania (maybe Ukraine Georgia and/or Armenia. Assuming if Ukraine/Georgia doesn’t go to the Polish+Czechslovak or V4 TT and Armenia doesn’t go to India)

1 Like

I don’t believe that to be a better alternative.
I strongly subscribe to the “minor axis in Italy” way of thinking.
And in my opinion, Romanian(already in the Italian TT), Hungary(already in the Italian TT) and Bulgaria(not quite yet) all belong there.

1 Like

I think there is another option of adding Bulgaria and that is to Czechoslovakia due to the Czech vehicles used by Bulgaria.

2 Likes

Czechoslovak vehicles are already present in the soviet tech tree and i’d wager they will remain there.

Polish vehicles are in United Kingdom and Germany, Romanian vehicles are in France, Italy and Germany, Yugoslav vehicles are in USSR
Czechoslovakia has been declined by smin as subtree for USSR.
M53/59 is Czechoslovak SPAA that was trialed by USSR
L-39ZA is sub-variant of L-39C (L-39C was used by USSR)
T-72M2 Moderna is T-72 based vehicle
Su-25K is export variants, same with Mi-24D

5 Likes

my main issue with that, is that “minor axis nations” only last until tier IV, after that, the rest is soviet slop just pasted into a NATO tree (italy). I would be more in favor of it being put in germany, and even then i’d prefer them to be independent, making the tree progression also cohesive regarding geopolitics

I personally believe spain should’ve been a subtree in italy before hungary did for that reason

1 Like

Spain as an Italian sub-tree would also have been great. I think Spain and Romanian should have been the Italian sub-trees and Hungary should have joined V4 with Ukraine as the primary sub-tree and Bulgaria could go there. Too late for all of this though…

2 Likes

I mean after Tier V they become NATO again so i don’t see the problem really.
Germany gets to be both Warsaw Pact and NATO briefly, Italy can also do that.