I’d say for the US add some twin seat F-15 or F-16 like a F-15B or F-16D.
1 Like
Oh true that would be pretty cool
1 Like
Saudi F-15’s?
Several versions - pick and choose!
Even f15c with aim120a is at 13.7
How can you expect the same being at lower br ?
I actually thought of this a bit ago and came up with a “If gaijin really doesn’t care about making anything unique and just throwing some random things together, of which also aren’t very historical for the sake of keeping their BR low” list of planes.
🇺🇸 - F-15C “Early” (13.3)
🇯🇵 - F-15JM ADTW “Early” (13.3)
🇮🇱 - Baz Meshupar “Early” (13.3)
These would all have locked 4x or 6x 120’s with rest of a:a pylons being 9M’s (a theme with all of these is their to some degree dubiously realistic and nerfed loadouts compared to tech tree eqv’s.)
🇬🇧 - ⨀Typhoon Tranche 1 (13.7)
🇩🇪 - EF-2000 Tranche 1 (13.7)
🇮🇹 - F-2000 Tranche 1 (13.7)
These would have the old loadout of the Euro’s, being single pylon racks for all amraams, optionally they could also swap out the Tranche 1 for simply being twin seater versions of the normal ones
🇫🇷 - Mirage 2000-5F (Early) (13.7)
Another hypothetical and borderline fictional plane, but would be a standard Mirage 2k with potentially MICA’s on a slightly gimped loadout
🇸🇪 - Gripen C “Early” (13.3)
Same goes for the M2k one.
Wouldn’t want this in game, as those Eurofighter premiums would likely be 90$ as the next price jump, but hey if they absolutely want to do this it’s an idea on the table
Some of the others posted here would be much better, like the ones racimazzedine made.
3 Likes
You cant add eft t1 because its literally the 14.3 one.
As for the f15 need to have worse radar than the tech tree.
1 Like
what about increasing the BR of the F/A-18C Early and give it AIM-9M so it’s actually competent? the F/A-18A could go to 12.7 and a 13.0 premium option would exist.
1 Like
i have heard France went to USA to test the earlier models of the F-15 with mockup AIM-7Ms and 4 rear-aspect AIM-9Ps.
That a 14.0 material, unless they limit it to 6 fox 3.
As for the 12.3 to 12.7 one, could work really good with 4 aim7p and 6 aim9m
1 Like
Yeah, again that’s why I say there’s an element of fiction to it. Either the EF’s are twin seaters so heavier with -2 Amraam’s, even still thats like a 14.0, or a fictional gimped one based on existing ones in the tree, Gaijin does funny things and it’s a headcanon they could make to justify it being lower.
For the F-15’s they could base it on the late F-15A’s that got Amraam integration (to what i remember that’d end up as a carbon copy of the F-15A as current, but with Amraam instead of sparrow, so no HMS/D), or just take the existing F-15C at 13.7 and drop it to 13.3 with -2/-4 Amraams like I said, which wouldn’t be too crazy of a plane. Further, I really don’t see a “need” for the radar to be worse, the Premflankers abysmal radar is identical to that of tech tree 27SM and only a slight improvement over the 27S one, and thats the least offending thing about it.
Hell, to what Dzhkグ said earlier up, you could make the Prem-15’s just be twin seaters with Amraams while being otherwise similar/identical to the singleseater tech tree ones, like the PremFlankers are.
They could use this as a French premium, it only carries 2 MICAs.
6 Likes
What the actual hell is wrong with you, asking for MORE 13.3 premiums?
It’s already bad enough and the monkeys we call devs just keep adding to the pile by ignoring how busted the existing stuff is.
Hell naw…
2 Likes
The issue is not 13.3 premiums, the issue is 13.7 premiums being 13.3
I don’t like premiums either, but they wouldn’t be as much of a problem if they weren’t all severely undertiered
1 Like
The only premium that is under tier is the 30mkk
Mk2 amv is 13.3 material. Literally one of the worst radar at 13.3 and even some 13.0 have better radar.
That said the 30mkk is justify because pl12.
Fair I guess
You act like this is not inevitable…Gaijin is going to do this no matter what for profit. We’re just thinking what they could add.
It’s entirely avoidable, just that the majority of the playerbase is gaslit into thinking that throwing money at the game is going to make their experience enjoyable ( it all boils down to the same thing in the end regardless).
It’s the only thing the devs can count on, once they run out of people they can bait into the game and into buying the premiums their entire system will collapse. May not happen anytime soon but it defo will at one point
Lol, you say that like the JA37DI is good at 13.0, imo it should be removed entirely, imo Sweden could probably get a 13.3 given how much the meta has shifted the silly 3rd gen delta is artificially held back compared to basically every other vehicle present at and around that BR.
Imo we need more decomp to fix these types of vehicles so I’m against more terrible 4)3rd gen ARH slingers unless they’ll be placed at a proper BR or are KWS standard in performance.
is going to make their experience enjoyable?
bro, premiums exist to make u progress way faster than normal, and some premiums are unique compared to copy-paste vehicles like the same italian M60 as the american one but with premium traits.
if u don’t like premiums then ignore them, or get out of this topic cuz it’s made to talk about premium vehicles Gaijin could add, not to talk about how they shouldn’t add more.
Italy has a premium M60A1, which is unique actually, it’s the only unstabilized M60A1 in the game.