Gaijin should have a look about this
3 Likes
This is an obvious mistake. I don’t know the reason why GAIJIN did this.99A has 7.1S+577mm.This is the slowest.Now Gaijin is starting to weaken the armor of 99A again.
3 Likes
These are very ridiculous problems, please fix them
Out of topic but the biggest problem with Chinese MBTs overall is the huge lower frontal plate, the british must explain something.
But, I may be wrong, most of these penetration bugs are caused by the game’s calculationg, and as, well mentioned by DPRK_19480909, the spaghetti code.
@Gunjob Has anyone made a formal or internal report on this issue? Gaijin has once again failed to model the Type 99 properly.
3 Likes
gaijin just made enough money from Chinese players. then they continued to discriminate against Chinese vehicles.
all of this seems more intentional. at least there haven’t been so many new issues before the update on the 25th. now Gaijin refuses to acknowledge the old version of armor KE screenshots.
and blocked all error reports. even imprison those who question them.
not only is the KE value of the hull reduced, the thickness of the bottom of the turret now is surprisingly only 350mm
we have never been able to obtain a vehicle that can rival T80BVM, Leo2A7, and strv122. Players have always been striving to achieve this. but Gaijin believes that Chinese TT only deserves to have a pile of garbage.
we got a s( )t VT4, and now we have another s( )t 99A.
at the slowest loading speed of 11.7. extremely poor penetration of shells. less peeling fragments are produced by shells. completely unreliable armor. is even worse than M1A1.
compared to other vehicles, mobility does not bring any significant advantages. And now the maps and combat distances are getting smaller and smaller.
there are no advantages to them, but some people still think they perform well.
this is the source and truth of the problem
of course, Leclerc and Mekava also have such problems.
extremely poor competitiveness without any “balance” adjustment.
do this during a Chinese themed version and the Chinese National Day holiday. Undoubtedly toxic and deliberate.
the 55 ton 99A tank lags behind the 45 ton Russian tank anywhere. the armor performance is even inferior to the old 99 designed in 1999. and they all adopt the same design concept.
just to fulfill their stereotypes and create the myth of Russian vehicle number 1
16 Likes
Chinese players need an explanation
3 Likes
@Pacifica No hate, my man, only pointing out this player’s rather exceptionally well-researched topic considering ZTZ-99A. Think they can make a suggestion in the suggestion forum and you can tag some of the other tech mods to have a look-see and confirm what’s being shown here?
1 Like
It’s a classic example that after one fix we have a new problem.But since this is a Chinese vehicle, I think it will be given the “not a bug”
2 Likes
I agreee
1 Like
Too double standards, the developers of this game didn’t even have enough evidence to make arbitrary changes, and even secretly made changes without publishing any announcements
4 Likes
on the contrary, this is Gaijin’s attitude towards Russian vehicles: intentionally adding some non-existent armor
I can almost find this intentional buff on any Russian vehicle. For vehicles from other countries, it is the opposite debuff
we Russia are really great!
10 Likes
This picture about 99A is very strange: the area of the lower half of the car body is too large, and in fact, this area has clearly exceeded the state shown in similar photos of 99A.
6 Likes
because there have a shovel
3 Likes
All of the issues (no less than ten) were dismissed without cause
1 Like
Yes there are numerous reports for modelling issues with the ZTZ-99 series of tank.
5 Likes
so can this standard be implemented? This is currently the closest information source to the 99A description.
under the same design philosophy. how can a 55 ton tank be more fragile than a 45 ton tank?
4 Likes
I’m just wondering, Am I describe this issue poor and causing the issue masters cannot understand what had I said and what had I quote?
6 Likes
they really love that two!
1 Like