Yes. Thank You^^
Also i am similarly in a situation with the Pbv 302 BILL myself- seeing as its atm a TD without scouting and a rather poor performance for a TD, And it being an IFV in real life. But seeing as its likely also put under the same limits as this vehicle, i get the frustration of everyone who plays this Vehicle.
If id guess they would likely ”water down” the APHE belts with HE or put a limit on the rounds like on the GEPARD
M53/59 The penetration depth is 90MM➕
lower fire-rate, less gun handling and as far as i know less mobile. other than that touché
Such as carry infantry for example?
Which just goes to how how the national tech tree system itself is long past it’s best-by date :(
How about they fix the bug where armour is being ignore by APHE, rather than mess with the APHE belt or amount of APHE being fired. Because that bug will still be there.
So you’ve never used the 341? The real issue with M53/59 is its reliance on HVAP rounds. 341 is not mobile by any means, and makes the T series tanks look mobile with its terrible reverse speed.
I Do not have all vehicles as for the reason i say as far as i know. Because I mainly main:
Sweden
France
secondly
Japan
Italy
Great Britain
Its more a problem with voulemetric pen, less by APHE
The issue with APHE damage is that the community Voted against the APHE nerfs…
And because an actual SPAA with twice ZSL92 main gun and smaller hull size sits below ZSL92 BR.
ZSD63/PG87 already exists at 5,7 Rank IV
Idc about the IFV/AA desgination tbh but at least give it recon…
The idea is that you need an spaa at every 1.0 or 2.0 Br jump atleast so it can keep up without loosing BR bonuses.
If you Take a:
BR 5.7 → BR 6.7 / 7.3
You will get a RP and SL loss when you play and the rewards wont be anywhere as good…
But yes i agree a majority of the vehicles in this game should get scouting if the are like the ZSL-92
wait BR affects with rewards too now?
That’s fine, but sometimes it’s better not to comment on vehicles you don’t know.
Has always been a thing. If you dont use vehicles near the BR you are researching you loose RP on it, You get the most effiencency by playing a vehicle at the same BR of the vehicle you are researching or by playing the vehicle That comes before it as it gets a 10% br boost for the vehicle you are researching:
Ex.
If you are researching the Pvkv II and you have the Pvkv III in that case the biggest reward you can get is by either playing a vehicle at 4.0 range or by playing the Pvkv III that is under the Pvkv II
But you get the same Amount of rp gain by playing a vehicle at the same BR as if you would use the predicessor vehicle
The ZSL-92 is pretty pointless at its current BR as it’s essnetially a downgrade over the ZSD63 for a .6 br increase.
Sure it’s closed top but it can still be killed by even light machineguns and the traverse speed of the turret is far from ideal to be used as an AA so the APDS shell would make sense
Plus it can be limited to a single APDS belt, much like the BTR-82 (also shouldn’t the ZSL-92 have 4x 100rd belts instead of 2x 200rd belts?)
In game it seems to be modeled with dual feed but both feed from the same ammo box
