Mentioning Romania led to a rabbit hole… what lied at the end was this:
PS: Yes, I made that. Was more relaxing than playing WT, 10/10, would make a TT again.
2 Likes
According to The Military Balance 2023, they use 11 ‘M-92s’ – which seems to be an alternative designation for the Type 92/ZSL-92 – in a self-propelled anti-tank role. Which I guess could be either. This article claims 10 in the APC format. But I can’t find any other information, nor any images. I have a feeling it’s likely either just APCs, or they don’t have any at all.
2 Likes
Bosna is hiding the true configuration of those vehicles better than the USA, Russia, China, France and the UK are hiding the specifications of their MBT’s.
4 Likes
new serbian military exresise first time seeing btrs and new sext footage of m 84
2 Likes
Some people: Yugoslavia wouldn’t have enough vehicles to be it’s own TT
Serbia: And I took that personally
8 Likes
hahahha well we are a neutral country after all more videos of new weapons at 1 min new aa everything else is also badass https://youtu.be/MGxqc0bO92Y?si=-22H_Tz2upLadWDk
2 Likes
Cool TT but also it could be added as a sub-tree of the USSR, to limit copy paste vehicles
12 Likes
What man ? half of the tanks in the game are copy pastes
Would love a New Nation to grind! +1 from me!
2 Likes
Yes and USSR should be a Chinese sub tree because their vehicles are now inferior to the chinese ones and cannot be at equal grounds to other nations’.
The same thing that you said but different.
I’m sure that yugobros will agree that they’d rather not have their stuff in the game than be sub treed to a russian to whom we have only superficial connections. No offense there
5 Likes
Bro how is the same things but different? I don’t understand why people are getting so excited over the same thing, And only to see them to play more foreigner tanks in other tech-tree, Question what’s the point of adding tech-tree to the game only to be the same to the game and having 3 diffrentt vehicles ?
The same thing? You may say that ground at higher tiers is based on T-72s regarding MBTs but they’re mostly just straight upgrades and some even better than russian original modern 72s. Besides that they got their own IFVs and SPAAs, more than any other potential new tech tree.
Their air is also way more unique.
So is the excitement justified? In this case yes it is.
6 Likes
Agree with some for point but in my opinion it isn’t worth making a whole new tech tree for the few jewels of tanks that are unique, Cool tech-tree, cool vehicles, But i wouldn’t like to grind a hole new tech-tree for a rank worth of vehicles, and that why i am suggesting it could be added to the ussr, it would fill out the gaps of the Yugoslav line ups offer Planes for realictic mode and air, it’s just a net benefit without doing any big changes.
Well there’s still the even more unique air tree.
But saying it’s not worth basically makes every other candidate tree worthless to be an independent one because if you go by those standards sweden and israel are kinda out of the question too.
Adding it to USSR is a sin, a large one though, they got way more stuff still to be added and god forbid we mix politics into that.
It’s not a benefit to the ussr tree in any way shape or form and has enough to stand on its own.
( Chad tito vs virgin ussr army of failure assasins)
3 Likes
HELL NO! For multiple reasons:
-
What do You mean “to limit copy-paste vehicles”? It has less copy-paste Vehicles than Italy, China, Israel and Sweden. And even then, the vast majority are low-tier vehicles that will be quick to research, not really a problem.
-
Yugoslavia isn’t like South Africa, Hungary, Romania or Finland, a nation only capable of supplying a single solid TT-line. It can supply multiple solid TT-lines with ease. Adding it as a Sub-TT will establish a precedant that will be a cause for concern for numerous National Communities which would cause them to band together with the Balkan Community in order to set the Forums on Fire.
-
The USSR is a massive TT, it does not need a sub-TT. Not only would doing so be as controversial as slapping North Korea and South Korea in the same TT, but the backlash Gaijin would receive for making the Soviet TT even larger would simply not be worth it. Especially with the existing “Soviet Bias” accussations and the controversy around France and Italy being in desperate need of more vehicles.
TL;DR: Adding Yugoslavia as a Sub-TT to the USSR would cause irreparable damage to Gaijin’s fragile reputation, set a dangerous precedent and spark a controversy as fiery as adding South Korea as a Sub-TT to China would.
PS: For the love of God, drop the subject and pretend like You never brought it up.
Note: You can make an argument to skip over the low tiers and for the Yugoslav TT to start at mid-tier. Or at least to break the connections between low-tier and mid-tier. the latter of which is a problem in the game as it is.
Edit: I would argue that all of the connections between different Tiers should be removed and that even more vehicles should be “foldered” overall.
11 Likes
From where did u get this info and do u have a link in which this is said bc to me this is new news and i live in Croatia.
1 Like
Leopard 2 - Wikipedia under “potential operators”
List of equipment of the Croatian Army - Wikipedia under “proposed/potential future equipment”
It might be true, it might not be, still an interesting thing to keep an eye on.
“bc to me this is new news and i live in Croatia” and I live in Macedonia and no one knew that our Government donated our T-72 tanks and Mi-24 Helicopters to Ukraine until the former were spotted on the border with Bulgaria on trucks.
1 Like
2 Likes
The USSR already has plenty of other nations it can get, Yugoslavia is too large to be considered a sub tree.
7 Likes