XM1302 -- The MPF Competitor

XM1302 – The MPF Competitor


1434667887738

The BAE Systems proposal of the MPF

For my newest suggestion, I am proposing the most up-to-date version of the M8 AGS ‘Buford’ originally developed by FMC. This is the prototype by BAE Systems called the “XM1302” developed for the Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) Program.


History

After the Vietnam War, the United States was looking to replace the inventory of M551 Sheridan’s. The vehicle would have an extended but ‘relatively’ successful life without a successor in sight. Following a series of attempts, the Army was eventually able to propose the Armored Gun System Program in the late 1980’s. Out of the 4 main designs, it was FMC that won with their XM8, an updated version of their CCVL design.

As the story goes, the vehicle would be officially designated as “M8” and began in a small production batch until the cancellation of said production by the U.S. government in 1996. This left a long lasting gap, filled by a short-term solution until many years later. For the time being, the M8 would only occasionally appear, with various testings to configure the chassis in different ways and even replacing the XM35 105mm with a 120mm cannon.


Expeditionary Light Tank on display at AUSA 2015

In the early 2000’s, BAE Systems would acquire UDI (United Defense Industries) and the M8. After the merger, BAE began the works on bringing back the M8 to the military world. They would debut this new version in 2015 as the “Expeditionary Light Tank”. This early version of their updates to the M8 included newer electronics, rubber tracks, and updated fire-control systems while still retaining the engine/power pack, add-on armor package, and overall profile of the M8 AGS. Around this time, the U.S. began their interest again in a new program called the “Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) Program”. This new program aimed to fill the gap that the Army has left open for a long time. Some requirements included being able to be airlifted by a C-17, and having enough firepower to penetrate defensive fortifications.

Upon the announcement of the MPF Program, various companies would propose their designs to the Army. The two that made it past the initial selections was General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) and BAE Systems. In 2018, both would be given contracts to build 12 prototypes for the competition. BAE would propose their newest and up-to-date version of their M8 under the MPF name. This newest version which as a prototype, was later designated as “XM1302”, featured more upgrades to bring the M8 up to current standards.


BAE Systems MPF Technology Demonstrator on display at AUSA 2019

In 2019 at AUSA, BAE would show off the (M8) MPF Technology Demonstrator featuring the Saab Barracuda MCS, modern electronics, Iron Fist hard-kill active protection system, external cameras for the driver and commander, new engine, power pack, and improved fire-control systems. Many of the previous improvements from the Expeditionary Light Tank design were either expanded upon or retained in this model. The add-on armor package and APS was an additional choice if it wanted to be mounted.

While production and testing was very active, BAE would falter. Around 2020, the COVID pandemic put a dampener on production. When time came to submit the 12 prototypes, GDLS was successful in their submission whereas BAE was late. Then in early 2021, BAE was disqualified from the program and left GDLS and their Griffin II (XM10) as the sole choice for the MPF program.


The XM1302 resting at the Army Armor & Calvary Collection in Fort Benning, 2023

After the failure, the Program Executive Office-Ground Combat Systems (PEO-GCS) felt the need to keep one of the BAE Systems MPF vehicle due to its unique technology as a research and historic example. As of 2023, the vehicle is now on display at the U.S Army Armor & Calvary Collection in Fort Benning, Georgia.


Specifications
  • Weight: ~23 t – 27 t
  • Crew: 3
  • Size:
    • Length: 8.97 m
    • Width: 2.69 m
    • Height: 2.54 m
  • Armament:
    • Main Weapon: 105mm M35 cannon
    • Depression/Elevation: -10°/+20°
    • Rounds:
      • 28 Total
        • 21 (Autoloader)
        • 7 (Front Storage Compartment)
    • Ammo:
      • M900A1 APFSDS-T
      • M456A2 HEAT-T
      • M393A2 HEP-T
      • M416 WP-T
    • Coaxial Weapon: 7.62mm M240 machine gun
    • Tertiary Weapon: 12.7mm M2HB machine gun
  • Maximum Speed: 72 km/h
  • Engine: 586 hp MTU 6V199 TE21 V-6 (437 kW)

Gallery

M8_3


References

For the in-game representation, the XM1302 would act as a strong addition to the top tier American line-up. Offering advanced ammo, quick movement, consistent reload, improved thermals, and acting as a backup to a full line-up. This would be a relatively unique and interesting choice to add if given the full suite of equipment from the AUSA demonstrator. In the end, this is to give an alternative modern choice of Light Tank for the United States. If any information you see is incorrect or missing, please let me know! And thank you for your time.

Would you like to see the XM1302 in-game?
  • Yes!
  • No!
0 voters
How would you like this vehicle to be implemented?
  • Tech Tree
  • Squadron
  • Premium
  • Event
  • N/A
0 voters
9 Likes

+1 for more light tanks

+1 for Britain

2 Likes

+1 from me. One of Gaijins last options at giving the US an XM8 style tank in the tech tree, and it’s definitely needed. I’m glad that this was finally suggested.

1 Like

In what way does this belong to the British tech tree?

3 Likes

image

The United States of America bruh

3 Likes

Produced by BAE systems

2 Likes

BAE also produced the Bradley and the M109, that doesn’t mean that Britain should get those vehicles. The XM1302 was specifically built to compete in the next light tank for the US. Also the XM8 system, which this was based off of, was acquired by BAE through UDLP, which got it from FMC, an American Company.

Let me also add, that the US’s division of BAE Systems designed the XM1302.

8 Likes

Well we already have the M109 so there’s that.

Yes because the UK operated M109’s.

1 Like

Yes, but I’d prefer they add it to the tech tree, and not as another event vehicle. The U.S. really needs more light tanks that aren’t event vehicles. No, I’m not upset still about the XM8 and CCVL, why do you ask?

6 Likes

Same here man, same here. If it wasn’t a tech tree, a riot would need to be put together. The US doesn’t have too many options for high caliber light tanks for higher ranks to begin with. Now 2 of them are locked away behind a pay wall.

3 Likes

I love the CCVL, M8, XM1302 family of vehicles, and it would be nice to see at least one of them as an researchable tech tree vehicle.

Now, seeing as the XM1302 is basically a souped-up M8, I really hope this bug regarding blow-out panels is fixed before it comes to the game.

3 Likes

That bug probably hasn’t been fixed because the XM8 is a forgotten event vehicle. Not too many people have it, so it doesn’t get much attention. If the XM1302 was added, I feel like the chances of the bug being fixed would be inevitable.

Also before the question is asked, the camo net on the XM1302 does NOT function as a thermal net, unfortunately. This would probably mean we get 2 XM1302’s in an update, one tech tree without camo net, one premium with camo net, unfortunately.