Work-In-Progress: Regenerative Steering — Should We Add It? Try It & Leave Your Feedback!

Yea which further worries me about this system

I think it was even earlier that that. Started as Centurion or Chieftain/Challenger related suggestion iirc

Actually you might be right the 1st Centurion got added in 2017

Hahah.

Basically, it was done right when 1.71 “New E.R.A” was announced. People fould RIDICULOUS the idea to even start getting modern MBTs without regenerative steering, hahah.

Now, here we are… people advocating for 2020s MBTs to turn like 1920s tractors only because it’s easier to drift-pull 180º turns at top speed.

1 Like

I think the M1128 might turn tighter than this which is saying something

1 Like

Thing is, now you can zigzag across the map with no loss of speed.

With the current Live system, you would come to a full stop in a 90-180º angle the second you pressed A/D lmao. Or, at best, don’t lose bearing but lose 60-80% of your speed.

Or do you only care about having the most unrealistically tight turning possible?

Again this is the only valid point to this system but many will agree that the stability of the current system is valued higher to them than getting to a rat spot a few seconds faster

1 Like

Here’s your tight turning. All I did was holding down W btw, it can’t be easier than this

3 Likes

Because of how maps have been designed the game has a heavy emphasis on brawling and regen is just flat out worse for it.

1 Like

Please watch the videos Ravanex just uploaded.

Driving at full speed across a city, except without losing speed.

Do you REALLY have an issue with this? Do you REALLY find it detrimental to mobility in ANY way?

Right now multiple maneuvers in those videos would result in your tank coming to a full stop. With regen steering it just keeps going

3 Likes

It’s an absolute NET improvement in mobility in each and every single imaginable way, yet some STILL manage to argue that it’s somehow a nerf…

1 Like

Cool, but this is unofficial. Doesnt mean much because yours and gaijins interpretation of how it should be added could be vastly different.

1 Like

Actually I do, im quite fond of how the tanks I play handle already and would rather lose speed to keep how they handle

1 Like

They saw the Leopard 2 (which might or might not been nerfed intentionally by Gaijin…) and decided that it’s bad. Good job from Gaijin I have to admit

Okay, then try the Type 10. It’s pretty much the same as these three

Ive seen the type 10 too. Ive also played GHPC which did a good job at regen. It still sucks for this game

So that’s what this is about at the end of the day? Fear of change, even if for the better?

You argued that you didn’t want to lose agility.

Therefore you were shown that proper implementation would not come at the cost of agility.

Now… there’s still a problem only because it’s different (better) by not making you unnecessarily and unrealistically lose speed?

1 Like

Lol no I didnt

I just said im fine with losing speed to keep how they turn

1 Like

So you are just fine with a broken system only because it’s what you are used to, and you don’t want it to be improved because you are afraid of change and having to spend a few minutes getting used to an objectively better system?

3 Likes