Interesting… I’d like to see what documents Gaijin used to place that Hydraulic Pump on Abrams in the crew compartment, because documents and pictures proving this to be completely false and it has been accepted by Gaijin as valid. Real pump is actually right next to the engine and for Abrams to lose turret traverse, both the pump and the engine would need to go down.
2 Likes
i mean this isnt up to question, r77 cannot pull 50gs irl, that requires thrust vectoring.
1 Like
??? HMD is extremely useful on soviet plane, precisely because their flight model sucks. At range under 20km it’s their best option to drop the R77. Having to go nose-on to lock the target is extremely detrimental.
That aside, I personally think the best way to use the Su-34 is with 6 R27ET. Not that I have the plane right now so I can’t really talk about its performances. But from what I’ve seen from Defyn and pretty much everyone else, it’s just a worse Su-27SM in everything excluding the radar.
1 Like
sources → bug report
3 Likes
Now, is everything that I or someone else counterargues as an example a skill issue to you?
Be more assertive in your speech, man. You know that the ERA of some nations, especially the Russian MBTs, is stopping rounds that would pass through them without any problem!
The explosion of a fuel tank inside an armored compartment with surrounding armor, such as homogeneous laminated armor, is capable of absorbing the shockwave that could incapacitate the crew. However, a carousel autoloader would never stop a sabot round from a Leopard or M1A2 SEP V2, which can penetrate 652/629mm of armor, let alone the fragments generated after the penetration.
Blaming volumetrics isn’t an excuse to accept the lies related to Russian and Chinese MBTs. Be realistic at least once with yourself! Accept that this would never happen, and they need to fix this as soon as possible. It’s not a bug, it’s a “buff” to make Russian MBTs more resilient.
All players already know how matches are more beneficial for nations like Russia and its partners. The vehicles come super OP, the armor has resistance beyond normal, and the ERA plates seem made of diamond. Tell me, where aren’t there at least 4 or 5 things that the Russians have, either superior or as “buffs” that have been given or left unchanged for years within the game? Where do you think the “Russian Bias” meme came from, my friend??? Stop defending the lies you believe just because they’ve been in the game for years. That doesn’t make them real because there are secret documents about each part of the MBT explaining what it does and what it can withstand.
Now, just because the F-15E/I had ONE SINGLE advantage in the air mode that is indeed realistic both on paper and in practice, they are nerfed just 2 days after the update. Tell me, is this game not favoring certain nations up to this point? It wasn’t enough to have months of complaints, they didn’t need to bring reports, documents, and images proving that the F-15E/I aren’t as fast as they were said to be.
They just went to the forums and cried for 12 hours for a change to be made to an American multi-role fighter. ONLY 12 HOURS, while we, the players in the USA, have been FIGHTING FOR MONTHS, and maybe YEARS, over the Abrams having spall liners inside and its armor containing depleted uranium.
1 Like
ACM spam is faster and easier than spamming lock with HMD.
Forced HMD is why I’ve avoided some aircraft.
The rectangular dogfight ACM on the Migs have the bad habits to lock allies.
Also it’s still limited to 10km when the HMD is now at 20.
1 Like
they not going to change it, its clearly a change meant to make the missile usefull as a shorter range fox 3, if they remove the maneuverability it just becomes useless.
So you’re not going to make a bug report then?
1 Like
Then cope seeth and mald , make some bug report then. Don’t know why complaining it to another player would help your case.
Cause this is a game , you gotta balance stuff even if it is unrealistic.
1 Like
no, i dont care to put the necessary research to nerf a mid missile into a worthless state. again 50g maneuverability requires thrust vectoring. and range cant be increased to a significant degree as the r77 was never really a match to western fox 3s.
1 Like
true, i just wish gaijin applied this logic consistently and most importantly was clear about it
Bro please , with a FM like su34 , the HMD is way way more useful than ACM. I don’t know why you gotta sugarcoat your own belief but HMD is way way better considering how *ss the soviet FM are
this dude is a troll, that or he has consistently the worst takes on this game.
@Zannafrancy12 post claiming that decompression, fixing Israel, vehicle accuracy, balance, and all other popular good takes the War Thunder community agrees on that I’ve stated thousands of times are “the worst takes on this game”.
Oh, and arguing for good changes, fixing Israeli vehicles, fixing the game, etc makes you bad according to their post.
So that’s a no then?
i mean no usually means no in my book
Just getting confirmation
Damn ERA helping the tank by making it more survivability is wrong ? Le what !!! Just stop sucking *ss and aim for the weak spot next time
Here the thing darling , it completely stop a shell , not just absorb. It eat the shell without affecting the tank. And make a bug report about T series auto loader eating an entire shell. Stop crying on here please
Because it is ?
All of this could be summed up with “US le mid *ss weak nation and USSR is strong biased nation”.
1 Like
Imagine… 50Gs doesn’t mean it actually does, it just means that is the limit. It never pulls 50Gs ingame, otherwise, why don’t u cry about MICA which also pulls 50 Gs.
2 Likes