idk about you, but I’d take the T60 over all the French 1.0 stuff, most of the Italian 1.0 stuff, 35t, pz3e, and any rank 1 spaa.
I mean it has mobility, large belt and slanted armor, the 32mm pen forces you to engage opponents selectively and get up close and personal but other than those there’s not really any problems with it.
if we talk about old french 1.0 sure, but newer models show at least some cannon so i would play them. The italians have interesting rank 1, they have good shots and protection OR good mobility and interesting looks, so i would rather use them too. Pz3E is garbage for sure, but 35t was not that bad in my mind. ANd the rank 1 spaa except the GAZ AA are great tanks to delete actual tanks XD
tho the slanted armor has major weakspots that are easy to pen as you cant be far away on T-60 to fight.
they are AMAZING, I had what, 6 victories in a row playing only APCR auto guns setup? Insanely good ratting vehicles. If it was T-60, I wouldn’t penetrate a single Panzer 3 (except for B one ofc)
and with T-60 I only had defeats, because well, I encountered many situations where I see 3 to 5 targets but can’t do much, and every player’s role like mine will affect victory result
M2A2 is actually better because it has amazing mobility and a 200 round belt.
Let’s see. There’s of course the L3, which is simply the worst vehicle.
There’s the Cone which has ok armor but killing tanks with 37mm APCR is a pain.
Maybe I like the Csaba even more than the T-60 so good chance it’s in fact worse.
There‘s also the AMC.34 YR, which has 47mm APHE with pretty slow reload that pens 27mm at most.
The T-26-4 is probably worse because it has poor armor, poor mobility and also a gun that isn’t all that effective due to its poor muzzle velocity.
Heck, the T-60 is probably more effective at 1.0 than the Sturmpanzer, which has nothing going for it fighting 1.0 tanks with that slow reloading, super low muzzle velocity gun.
this statement is entirely wrong. Sturmpanzer has survivability, damage and relatively good reload for guaranteed kill on 1.0. Im being quiet about 180 mm HEAT, which you can use up to tier IV
Fair enough, same principle, different materials. I’ve always thought it was just hardened penetrator with softer outer shell, I didn’t realize there was some rule about what the penetrator had to be made from.
telling me Gaijin modeled somethin incorrectly is not exactly mind blowing…
20mm AP at 800 RPM also is a lot of damage when it pens and you don’t have a couple seconds reload after a burst unlike a cannon.
A T-60 can kill a bunch of low tier tanks in seconds.
Maybe you can’t pen a Pz III but if a Pz III gets killed by a T-26-4 then because he gave him the time to aim his gun.
Unless you play the T-26-4 very defensively and make use of the low muzzle velocity to lob shells, pretty much any tank is going to kill it before it can shoot at them.
T-60 can at least bounce some shots from he front.
