As a Canadian the Ram do not belong in the US tree just the the US has no right to own Canada.
The Ram was built in Canadian Factories for the Canada army and Commonwealth.
Guess why army gave the Canadians the glory they deserved when worked with (hint it’s not the Yanks)
The Swiss hunter should have been added to the British tree, no argument there.
The US is a major operator of the Harrier and is a tree in game. The Harrier should be in both trees.
No, Britain doesn’t need 3 sub trees. SA is enough.
They are a major operator of everything that they use
The Ram was built using American parts. Canada isn’t a tree in game.
It’s fine in the US tree.
and lot of American stuff is built with British parts this point doesn’t mean anything
It should be in the UK because they USED the tank. To the point they even owned some.
Here suggestion for the ones owned
The US is a tree in game. Canada is not.
When countries don’t have a tree in game, their vehicles go to the next logical tree.
And yes, I’m aware of the Hunter. Literally your one argument against that logic.
Yeah the country that is the head of state of makes sense
Again. This is the entire point of this thread. Its not “Give Britain everything in the Commonwealth” (although the Indian T-90 kinda proves that that could happen) Its lets better represent these fundamental parts of Britain’s history and major Commonwealth nations by officially adding Australia and/or Canada to the British TT. In doing so though ,this would then mean all the vehicles you have mentioned thus far as “being US because Australia and Canada dont exist” would end up in the British TT. This would also mean their vehicles arent scattered all over the place
Does anyone remember the name of that random Argentinian tank Germany has nothing to do with yet they got in their tree too?
Dude every time you say something as though it’s a hard rule it has been shown to been violated by the top 3 nations. We are just asking for our countries and our tied and our oaths to our monarch be respected. And when we use something and make it our own it should be in the tree we represented in the real world and still part of, britain.
If politics mattered, Taiwan would be a US subtree.
well to be fair alot of Germans went to Argentinian after the war
The only reason the Argentinian version went to the German tree is because the French mains had a meltdown when the Swiss SK105 was being added to Germany. The Argentinian version was a compromise.
With some nations they have enough vehicles to warrant their own tech tree. With others most of the stuff is C&P which will put it as a subtree. Canada and Australia don’t have to be a subtree but they also aren’t unique in different areas. Both have a unique air force but in more recent years they’re mostly filled with the exact same American aircraft. I would love Canada and Australia to come into the game in full force.
They say there China that why they are in China
How does any of that logic make sense to you?
When were either Argentina or Switzerland made tech trees in the game?
in the future you be able to play a cf18 with Canadian leopard
also the only Canadian leopard is 83 gajin so ouch
That would be nice.
The logic makes sense to almost everyone in game but a handful of British players that want every vehicle they can come up with the thinnest of relation to their tree.
WE are the head of state that isn’t a thin relation. The UK from Canada burned down the white house they are very much related to the Uk i don’t see why refuse to move on this as it could cause Canadian players who wanted to use a line up of there stuff to never happen