Would not be affected by german leopards getting D tech
1 Like
…or the simple fact it’s still on the hull despite multiple reasons it shouldn’t be if it wasn’t still connected somehow. You’re the only one coping here. :)
1 Like
It’s crap in WT. Last paragraph.
Sees pictures of the turret completely dislogded. Makes an unfounded assumption based on “hurr durr muh frontal weight”, ignores that there’s a whole lot of weight in the back as well “no, you’re coping” :nerd_emoji:.
To make it as simple as possible for you, if the turret is removed from the turret ring (which is the only physical connection it has with the hull), it’s no longer being held in place. If you are unable to understand that, well, nothing I can do about that… not my place to force people to change their beliefs, and would be a waste of my time as well.
1 Like
Sits flush with hull, can’t see any gap, hasn’t slid in direction of slope, and the frontal armor and gun aren’t lifting or removing it despite being unbalanced and off center. It is still attached to that hull. You haven’t provided any evidence to prove otherwise. Stay mad! :)
1 Like
Cool:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/945473344449437726/1150055302889226361/image.png?width=383&height=245
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/945473344449437726/1150194469082243102/image.png?width=381&height=195
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/945473344449437726/1150194519116099655/image.png?width=455&height=289
It’s totally “in flush” with the hull, it’s totally out of the turret ring - the only thing keeping it there is the fact the ammunition explosion wasn’t powerful enough to make it join T-72B3s in the turret throwing competition. Haven’t seen this much cope since the first T-90M loss.
3 Likes
The tanks that upgrade to fight insurgent mostly you can see M1 Abrams and Challenger 2 not all western tanks they have an upgrade kit for it like TES or TUSK (which underperform in the game) basically they can do more job in urban environment you can see side ERA or NERA and CROWS Leopard 2 on the other hand are different Leopard 2 designed to fight Russians tanks and never change in doctrine as you can see leopard 2 in service across Europe don’t have armor like TUSK on Abrams and CROWS but MEXAS-H that can protect kinetic round on hull front and even made Rh120L/55 longer version of L/44 that should increases penetration of DM53/63 by 15 percent what they had in mind? ofc Leopard2 are made to kill tanks unlike both Abrams and Challenger Leopard 2 seem to never change doctrine and from what they designed for at the begin with
and document on Leopard 2 armor are easier to get than any other western tank.
the fact that Russian tank ammo doesn’t detonate in the game you know the round that does not explode irl when hit exist it DM63 and Russian ammunition in the game act like DM63 already maybe gaijin ready make DM63
1 Like
Yes, the turret is still flat against the hull. Despite your mental gymnastics and rage MSPaint cope. :)
Sorry this doesn’t throw its turret like the Soviet cosmonaut capsule tanks.
You still haven’t shown any detachment. :)
1 Like
XD
You’ve changed my mind, Razer is no longer the most delusional person on this forum. Take the crown, have fun. I’ve said my piece, no need to waste any more time on you.
1 Like
Keep drawing red lines on the side of tank turrets that are still connected to their hulls. It won’t make you right. :)
I’m fine with it. No protests from me, just trying to explain why we haven’t seen it, which from the perspective of the players sucks. I hope they add it in.
More than half of the documented T-80s destroyed have blown their turrets off. It happens. A LOT.
Despite your conspiracy theories, Russian tanks have serious flaws and their ERA hasn’t stopped all of the weapons they’ve claimed it would. Hence RedEffect pulling down his video that claimed Javelins wouldn’t work against Russian tanks.
RedEffect? heh if ask him “Can Russian tanks withstand direct hit from nuclear weapons?” he would have say “Yes” I never believe any words from that guy anyway.
1 Like
NATO tanks are added at a snail’s (haha) pace because the moment Gaijin goes too far Russia and other minors will be tremendously outmatched, they have to worry about the balance of the game otherwise top tier will be NATO and China brawling while the minors watch in the distance
Not just the documented T-80s, either. More than half of the documented destroyed T-72s have blown their turrets off as well.:
To find bias you must play against said nation. If you can’t kill any of the t series that is a you problem not game problem. Russian tanks are just as kill able as every other nation.
2 Likes
Do a diagonal shot into the T-80BVM fuel tank, watch as absolutely 0 spall is created and how the shell literally phases through the entire tank. Now do the same with the M1A2 and watch how the 30mm plate protecting the fuel tank shrapnel the entire tank.
Yes, this is a game problem at that point.
2 Likes
You think what i’m doing for entire times hm? play it myself and against it i can do both and well experience both of it. You better not start with me go pick someones else that you think you can BS with not me
Yeah it’s not like Russian tanks overperform or anything, I’m sure they have magic spalling in real life too
All fuel tanks absorb shots. Literally all of them. This isn’t new or revolutionary. Fuel tanks are doing what they are meant to.
2 Likes