Why can't NATO have a well armored MBT?

It would be very welcome. Im still on hopium that Challys 2 will get fixes, in like 5 years time.

Hoping same thing for Leclerc’s and Merkava’s as well.

Ariettes

Man those are really sad tanks tbh.

But even if Gaijin fix Ariete series, protection level will not be suffucient at top tier.

While it is true, Panzers 4 would not be as scary from the front.

1 Like

Overall most of the “Minor Nations” sould be looked at

1 Like

Lmao. That sentence reminded my old experience with Leclerc S2.

İ believe 2 years ago an M18 shot my Gun breach area and destroyed my Leclerc instantly because of how bad breach armor is.

He even apologized for that action :)

Still can be done just fine

Yea i know, was pointing that issue because of how you pointed Panzer 4’s.

And i bringed up PZ4 because i died to it in an Ariete. (yes i know i do not have it on my acc, i just had the pleasure to play most top tier mbts over the years)

This shows how Gaijin little cares about those nations.

Shame on you Gaijin.

I mean minor nations get on average 3 things per update with ocasional bigger changes, so it is some type of care.

But at the topic of MTB armor i will just leave this here


1 Like

They look the same. On critical hit its about 8% chance. This was on the German, Swedish, and russian tanks I looked at quickly at top tier.

Okay. Boycott it.

I don’t see how any of this is my problem

This topic can be closed up by typing: They are like this because Gaijin make them like that. All that can be done is bug reports and hoping for the best.

So… you get copy pasted Leopard 2a5 data:

image

First of all, i do not want it to close, i just stated it can be ended with one simple sentence. Second, im going to check that, brb.

I guess i realy do get Leo data.