What are you even trying to tell me?
US has post revolution Iranian F-14 but I doubt that’s any grounds for a full on Iranian sub with every Iranian vehicle added to the US
I agreed sure it does give some benefit but it cost more problem to the game itself and make game less unique i mean nowadays i wanna play Leopard2 I don’t even need to grind German when France and Italy can also offer me that which bring questions what the point of TT anyways?
That is my main concern with Indias additions to Britain and the current state of our top tier air.
The only thing we are missing is a source for an F-15 and F-16 and we could end up with everyones top tier aircraft
I was considering Sweden air back in 2023 as a Gripen looked interesting… That is no longer necessary
I kinda understand US main frustration at this point lol at least Israel have their own version of US jet that make them somewhat unique
About India sure look interesting but Rafale and SU-30 in British TT? I mean it look dumb i might don’t like Russian main but i can understand their frustration about this since T-90 which shouldn’t have been in UK tt
If ask me Gaijin should have limit about this if not adding sub tree is not possible anymore.
1 Like
Yep, it is entirely unncessary. Im dreading things like our top tier IFV is going to be a BMP variant rather than the Ajax or instead of CR2 fixes we get something from India which is miraclously extremely good and modeled with great care. Let alone the fact we still dont have the Typhoon in a healthy state and I can just see an Su-30 C&P added with KH-38MTs to replace Brimstones
and yeah. SA was too much already. Added multiple Sub-TTs… to a nation demanding native additions… just sucks
3 Likes
lol yeah reminds me that they refuse to fix Leclerc that French commu throwing lot of documents begging Gaijin to fix how do Gaijin fix it?
Throw the Leopard 2 to their face damn i can tell you i was laughing my a*s off when i saw that France going to get Leopard2 lol
3 Likes
Not that leos are treated better.
2a7V hold to a 30y old armor test from sweden. And got worse armor then the swedish variant for whatever reason cause gajins likes playing favourites. When multiple sources as well state that the 2a7V plate developed out of the strv122 one
1 Like
It doesn’t help that Gaijin felt the need to add the F/A-18s as well while the British tree has plenty of copy-paste opportunities that don’t require involving third party nations.
As much as I usually hate copy-paste, at least give us copy-paste that actually was operated by Britain.
- We still don’t have the Canadair Sabre F. 4 (CL-13 Mk. 4) that was originally built for Britain
- No tech tree Walrus or Osprey, despite them already being in the game as catapult planes
- Our only Hunter FGA.9 is a Rhodesian premium
- No T18 Boarhound, despite them being built for Britain
- No T17E1 Staghounds with regular turrets either (most of the turrets already are in-game on other vehicles)
- No M22, despite the fact that it wouldn’t exist, had Britain not requested an airborne tank
- No T14 Heavy, even though it was a joint project between Britain and the US
These are just the ones off the top of my head.
2 Likes
Being able to have a lineup consisting of Leopard’s, LAV’s, ADATS’, CF18’s etc… the dream… at least now we can represent our flag with the flag update…
This one bothers me tbh, it was a joint project which ended up abandoned by both parties no?
We also could get Jordanian medications of CR1
The Australian vampires and venoms as well would be nice.
The plethora of hunters.
On that note why the mk58a has rwr is quite odd.
Seeing as the hunter 80 package was what fitted it with the rwr and counter measures.
The F58A could use aim9 j as well as the mavs
Don’t forget the British were also the only ones to use the Locust I (M22) in combat. The British were also the only ones to use the Boarhound I (T18) in service.
If the US only got the 37mm and 6-Pdr Mk III pilot vehicles, while the British got the production Boarhound. I’d have been fine with that.
2 Likes
Big no… If anything, Canada should be closer to the UK’s tree than the US… my two cents…
1 Like