They arent calling it an LF.
Clearly labled Mk.IXe (CW). The basic F prefix was rarely used as it was the default.
Which means it’s an LF Mk9 as that’s its capabilities.
Thanks for arguing my point for me.
Read what i wrote, not what you want to read.
Irl Mk.IXe(CW) =/= LF.MK.IXe as it completely omits the rather important engine change. If its an LF in game it should be called that.
Maybe you are fine with misleading information but in sure most players would welcome the cards matching the models.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
may i introduce you to nearly all the over br vehicles? france and britian have always been the worse tech trees
France’s exclusive over-BR’d vehicles are coincidentally the Leclerc, by 0.3 if they’re 12.0; I’ve been using the American Leclerc, the M1A1 at 11.3 but in my 11.7 lineup. France 1.3 - 8.7 is all great and well balanced.
And Britain I can’t think of any cause I’ve played every BR of every game mode for Britain.
Britain’s easy from 2.7 to 12.0 ground [just not DM53 handholdy, which is fine. I use the onion layers of protection so the tank playstyle doesn’t really change], and all of air. “Easy” in my case for air is having above 1:1 KDR in fighter aircraft cause I am notoriously average in skill prior to my understanding of advanced missiles.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
@LeonDasPro
No one’s quoting you nor misrepresenting you.
Please stop misrepresenting other peoples’ posts with false claims.
If the quotes aren’t you, which they aren’t as I said they aren’t, then they aren’t representing you to begin with thus cannot misrepresent you.
france… 1.3 is great? so your just a troll then?
also british air has spitfires which are pretty good… thats about it, the americans have better harriers, better phantoms all at the same BR, the Jaguars and Buccs are decent-ish at ground but are over br in air
tornados are notriously bad and over br just in general, in ground and air, the Spits, Jas39, and some random planes here and there are the only good planes in britian
also not talking about british ground which uh… 4.7 is kinda good same with 8.3 but there is much better vehicles at similiar brs in other tech trees, 10.3 is probably the best br for britian and its still not the best 10.3 and also premiums ruin it
also this isnt mentioning all of the nerfs that just dont need to be in the game, the CR2s are all stupidly nerfed for no reason with a myriad of bugs, the chieftan and cr1 also have incorrect ammo
i can go on
i wont talk about france as you said 1.3 is great so you CLEARLY dont know shit about france as 1.3 france is possibly the WORSE in the entire game
also you did quote leon and also… i may be wrong but he seems to be talking about the F prefix is rarely used and the screen uses LF while not using it on the other one
LF and F are different prefixes
The deliberate use of “…” implies quoting, just without using the inbuilt function, especially in context with the preceding sentence.Why use it otherwise?
@DatCheesecakeBoi
Really, you think the Tornado, F-111F/C, Su-24M, Mig-27K are all over BR’d? lol
Tornado IDS is correctly BR’d, and I was one of the ones to discover its old BR was blatantly OP.
With chaff changes the 0.3 disparity between the IDS and GR1 hasn’t impacted me personally though they should be the same BR probably, and Mig-27K is the closest analogue.
Tornado ADV is obviously powerful.
Bucc S2 is correctly BR’d in air, I should know having played it.
Jags are obviously correctly BR’d.
USA has equal harriers. “Their engine heats up less.” K, they’re still subsonic.
And I haven’t had issues with Phantom FG1 despite trying to have issues with it.
12.0 ground for Britain is easier than 10.3 ground for me.
France has the D2 at 1.3, it’s great.
You have to realize I completed France and Britain entirely.
Only time I used a premium was Sea Vixen, which was unintended cause I just played it to play it.
Different perspectives =/= malice.
@LeonDasPro
The use of quotations is to provide a statement that is not mine.
If I was quoting you, a - Leon would be after the quote for example.
The quotes are there to provide my perspective on what you stated, not my statement on your statement, but my perspective.
Quotation marks (“…”) is universally used to indicate direct speech and quotations. Adding the name as a suffix is normally as a reference to the location of source material or identify the author and not the wording itself. The statement within the quotes must still be accurate.
So yes you misquoted me. There is no argument or excuse.
You have a right to your views, but don’t twist others to fit your narrative.
oh this is fun you dont know what your talking about, first off all idk why your introducing other vehicles, im ignoring the russian ones as i dont care enough because of how different they are
the Tornado IDS and the Tornado GR1 are the same aircraft, for some reason tho the italian and german ones have better engines, but again all 3 are bad, 11.7 with only 2 9Ls?
now moving on to the F111 as you mentioned it, the F111F is better then the F111C and shouldnt be the same BR simple as
the Tornado ADV, and Tornado F3 despite only being 0.3 br higher then the GR1 and IDS have 6 more missiles, which overall makes them much better, but they are still worse then the competetion for the most part, skyflashes suck ingame, enjoy facing Fox 3 missiles with only like 6km range
the Bucc S2 is over br for air like the jaguar, they are fine in ground, however they are literally worse then the other planes at a similiar br even in britian alone
now we gonna move onto the phantoms because its just a small thing, they are just worse then the US counterpart at the same br, worse missiles, the skyflash, worse flight because they dont have the slats, and thats not even mention the F4-JUK which is a straight downgrade over the F4-J at the same br, no HMD, worse missiles, no slats ect
and now to the harriers! where shall we start? you right about the heating up, but lets go for the fox 3 harriers first, Britian gets a Sea Harrier at 12.0, america gets a Harrier 2, a Harrier 2 is a MUCH better airframe then the Sea Harrier, not to mention the Harrier 2 has a better loadout for air-air, also on the part of subsonics, the other Sea Harriers, why do they have a worse loadout when compared to the A10 at a lower or same br depending on the one we are talking about? oh and the GR7, britians only Harrier 2, is also much worse then the AV8B+ in air and ground despite being the same BR in ground
oh and the other harriers are pretty much on par but the US version is still slightly better, oh and dont forget the worse harrier ingame is british!
Spitfires of later mk had universal wing. Every single one could be changed at the airfield for the mission demand. Clipped wing gave better role rate but reduced the climb rate and higher altitude performance. Then there was the extended wing tips for high altitude performance but I believe mostly used for reconnaissance duties.
These weren’t unique planes with one wing or another.
I think any game maker that tries to truly replicate Britain’s fighting vehicles in WW2 will make a miserable playing experience because they were what they were.
The tanks were mostly crap, the bad planes bad and the good planes good.
That is actually how it was.The best thing the UK made in WW2 was probably commercial vehicles such as the AEC Matador which Hitler would have killed for in Russia for but don’t feature in the game.
If we had of sat the war in Europe out and just sold trucks to both the Germans and the Russians things might have been very different for the UK later on.Again a moot point game wise.
the game is not by production year tho, also the aphe is probably the main reason, the main issues of british tanks were just crew comfort and the like, so things that dont matter, also if britian just bad… why move the fox, cearnvon and centurions all up in br? mutiple times? oh thats right because british tanks can be good it just gaijin puts them at a br that is too high
1 Like