no?
Let me correct:
It can still carry an equivalent amount of A/Bs while carrying more 120C/DS
Making the distinction between amraam variants kind of a moot point
so we are just making stuff up
or show me your source for the Su-35 having LDIRCM
not any more
at least on dev you cant bring mrml if you put 120b or 9m on wing stations
P sure it’s Su-57 that does
Not 35
Huh?
Can you show?
It was in the changelog, it’s daft.
only if you are making new loadouts
ones that were already made still work
Can you show?
I’m on my phone so it would be an absolute pain to check
here
1 Like
But you can still run 12 amraams total?
Not a major deal then tbh
yes
you cant bring aim9s and 120As on the wingpylons anymore when carrying the MRML
I had read the Su-35SM was set to get the DIRCM nodule that the Su-57 has and the potential for the Radar.
My mistake if that is not the case.
yes if they are all C/D or with up to 4 120A on the missile stations
But in that case the F-15C GE would run out of missiles first. Each time the EFT pulls in, and launches one missile, the F-15 launches at the EFT, and the EFT’s missile, leaving the EFT with 2 AIM-120s, and 2 AIM-9s
Yeah, not a major deal then
Meta load out is mostly 120Ds on C GE either way
1 Like
Don’t have the GE so can’t confirm, but would assume it’s due to the unclipped nature of the 120As causing minor clipping. Realistically probably a minor nerf to try force it into BVR.
Gripen E got a minor nerf to its SDBs too somewhat arbitrarily, don’t really know what Gaijin have been thinking with some of these balance changes but it’s certainly not grounded in reality
What?
C GE won’t need to do anything other than “aura farm” wile it waits for euro to get out of defensive position
It doesn’t need to fire a second amraam every time it mcms
yes and eft gets 8 amraams + 2 9ms
you know, more missiles
thats it
the 9L/M also intersects with the fins of the 120s on the double pylon
